Harry Potter Is Good For Science

113

May 26, 2003

Posted by Melissa Anelli

Canwest News Service’s John Robson wrote a rebuttal dealing with Canadian mathematician Dr. Ivar Ekeland’s statements that Harry Potter is bad for science.
(Editor’s Note: Although it’s nice to see someone rebute Ekeland, in my opinion Robson does it in a very negative way and I also disagree with many of his statements. He comes across as very patronizing.)





3 Responses to Harry Potter Is Good For Science

Avatar ImageBrosia23 says: People need to calm down about it all.Avatar ImageBrosia23 says: A great one, but still, a novel.Avatar ImageBrosia23 says: It is a book, a fantasy novel.

Write a Reply or Comment

The Leaky Cauldron is not associated with J.K. Rowling, Warner Bros., or any of the individuals or companies associated with producing and publishing Harry Potter books and films.