MyLeaky Login

Join the largest Harry Potter Social Network on the Web! | FAQ

In the News

Leaky Interview with GLAAD (The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation)

Books
Posted by: Melissa
October 24, 2007, 06:45 PM

Since Friday evening's revelation that Prof. Dumbledore is gay, we've seen a lot of confused and oftentimes hurtful response and commentary on the topic. So, we called up GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, an organization that works specifically with the representation of gay characters and people in media, to help clarify some of the issues and talk about what this fact about Dumbledore means for our culture. A transcript of our interview with Sean Lund, the organization's director of Messaging and Communication Srategy, follows.

(Please again be reminded that debate is welcome but disrespectful, name-calling, hateful comments are being routinely deleted.)

~*~

The Leaky Cauldron: Thank you very much for taking the time to speak to us. Can you tell us more about GLAAD and what you do?

Sean Lund: GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, is an organization that has at its core the fundamental understanding that words and images matter, that what people see in the media has a really important impact on how they view the people in the world around them and how they treat the people in the world around them.

I think we have a really great opportunity here to have a longer discussion about Prof. Dumbledore, about the characteristics and the qualiites that he embodies and to talk about the fact that one of the most beloved people in the Harry Potter series is gay.

TLC: What's the reaction been like for you?

SL: Most of the reaction that we've been hearing from folks as we've been talking about it with various media outlets has been very positive. We've seen, as I'm sure a number of your readers have, some of the message boards at The Leaky Cauldron and elsewhere that have been largely very supportive of J.K. Rowling's decision. There have been some of those who have seized on the opporutnity that the conversation provides to engage in some stereotypes and some slightly unkind behavior, but overall I think the conversation has been positive.

TLC: What do you think is the most important thing to urge people to remember as they are dealing with this revelation?

SL: I think it's important to remember that Prof. Dumbledore is exactly the same wise, loyal, kind character that those of us who have been reading the books have always known. He still embodies generosity and integrity and courage and the importance of protecting others. Just because he happens to be gay doesn't make him better and doesn't make him worse. It's just one of the parts of who that character is, which his exactly what being gay is in the real world: it's just a part of what makes each of us unique and each of us different.

TLC: One of the things we're noticing is that there are some real misconceptions out there about what it means when you say that somebody is gay. There is a bias toward, an unfortunate assumption that gay means other things, such as child molestation and pedophile. Is this common?

SL: I think any time you're dealing with the misconceptions and myths and stereotypes about gay people you tend to be coming from a place of ignorance or more commonly fear about what it is like to be gay. I think one of the most important messages of the Harry Potter books is how fear, whether it's fear of what's different, whether it's fear of losing power, whether it's fear of change, can lead people to do and say things that are at best unkind and at worst sometimes even dangerous.

Some of the comments that we've seen about Prof. Dumbledore and some of the other comments that we've seen over the past several days relating to this story have kind of crept into those areas of stereotypes and misconceptions, and I think that the really valuable thing that folks like you and other folks that are really Harry Potter fans and other folks in the media are doing, is really raising the level of conversation so that those stereotypes and myths aren't allowed to go unchallenged.

TLC: Can you remember a recent time when another fictional character has been revealed as gay that has had this kind of impact?

SL: I think that probably the one that springs to mind most readily is the character of Willow on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," back, I think it was probably about six years or so ago now when [the show's creator,] Joss Whedon, who revealed in a very gradual way and in a way incredibly authentic for that character that she was gay and introduced her girlfriend Tara, and the two of them became a really wonderful couple on that show. That was a really perfect exmaple of how to do this sort of storytelling and how to create these characters right. When you take a look at how the audience reacted to that, there was such an investment in those characters and in that relationship. The Willow and Tara relationship became in some ways the moral center of that show.

I think very much with how J.K. Rowling has brought Dumbledore out, I think that sort of quality of maintaining the authenticity and maintaining the truth of the character really goes a long way in terms of making sure people stay invested in those characters, and in fact that people could keep even more invested and feel like they have additional points of identification with those characters.

TLC: The Willow comparison also touches on something else - we've been getting a little backlash from gay people as well, who complain that it's yet another gay character killed or was lonely (Tara, Willow's girlfriend is shot in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"). Is this a common theme in gay culture as represented in the media?

SL: I think that we have definitely seen some of that criticism and I tend to think about the fact that for many people who have read these books since the very beginning - I happened to come in around the time book three was published - for many readers who are coming into these stories now, they are coming into a series of books where the character of Dumbledore will always have been known to be gay. There are other people who just finished the series with the release of Deathly Hallows who are now able to go back as readers have been doing since the books came out, and go back into the stories and view the characters through this new revelations that have been in the new book or in J.K. Rowling's recent interviews and really come to a deeper and richer understanding of these characters.

J.K. Rowling's revelations, could they possibly have happened in the books? I'm not sure, you'd have to ask her. What you'll see is that she set the stage for all readers of these books, be they those who have already finished them and those who have yet to pick up even the first book, to have a deeper and richer interaction with these characters.

TLC: This is the largest, most popular fantasy series of all time, this is a huge and respected character. To make not just any character but Dumbledore, the kind brilliant professor, Dumbledore, gay - is there any way to quantify what this means to the way that gay people have been portrayed in the media or accepted in culture?

SL: At the heart of GLAAD's initiative is a very simple idea, that words and images matter, and I think the idea that J.K. Rowling would reveal that Prof. Dumbledore is gay sends a tremendously important message. It sends a message that heroes and people who we respect, and people that we look up to, come in all different shapes and sizes. And I think for the readers of the books, for the people who will see the movies in the future, I think that's a tremendously important message for them to carry forward.

TLC: Some parents are dealing now with children who are confused about what it is to be gay, and there are children confused because they are taught that it's bad, and they don't want to believe their parents who say that it's bad. What do you suggest parents do, and what do you suggest children whose parents aren't willing to talk to them, do to understand what this means?

SL: I think a lot of that ties back to what we were talking about earlier, which is that a lot of these stereotypes and myths and misconceptions about gay people really are borne out of a lack of knowledge and more specifically a fear of things that are different and people that are different. I think that when you look back at the Harry Potter books, one of J.K. Rowlng's most important themes is about treating people with dignity and respect.

I think one of the most important themes of the Harry Potter books is J.K. Rowling's message about making sure that we treat all people, whether they are the same as us, or whether they are different than us, with dignity and respect. If you think about it, one of the central conceits of the books is that there are purebloods, and muggles and half-bloods, and there is constantly some conflict among those, particularly among those who fear and hate those who are different, and in one very vivid example of that, would call them mudbloods. That's the sort of unkind language, the sort of stereotypes and sort of misconceptions that really do lead people to mistreat and dehumanize others.

You think about Prof. Dumbledore. Even before any of us knew that Prof. Dumbledore was gay, I think that we can agree that his character would never have approved of mistreating or abusing others or thinking ill of others. Now that we know that he's gay I think it's a very important reminder that whether you're straight or gay or are in the process of figuring that out, being the kind of person who treats others with love and dignity and respect, who looks out for other people, who stands up for them, and who protects them, is really what being a good person and good friend is all about.

TLC: What do you think the overarching impact of this revelation will be on the culture going forward?

SL: When a character like Prof. Dumbledore is revealed to be gay I think it has a tremendously influential impact of readers of all ages. J.K. Rowling's decision to allow readers to see Dumbledore for all of who he is, and I think also as importantly, her determination to preserve the authenticity of his character both in the films and the books, is going to enrich the power of these stories for generations to come.

I think that this provides a really great opportunity to remind ourselves and for readers of the books to remind themselves about one of the key themes of the Harry Potter series, and that is how fear of what is different can really lead people to do things that are unkind or dangerous and also at the same time elevate the sort of person that people really want to be in terms of the way they treat others. When you hear someone on the playground say "You're so gay," or, "That's so gay," that's a word that they're using as an insult. They're trying to hurt another person and make themselves feel bigger by making other people feel smaller.

Even before Ms. Rowling revealed that Prof. Dumbledore was gay I can't imagine that his character would ever have approved of mistreating or abusing others. And now that we know he's gay it really is an especially important reminder that whether you're gay or straight, treating other people with dignity and respect really is one of the most important values that we all can share.

~*~

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent Books News

419 Comments

Roger

NAMBLA’s real? I thought that was a funny gag that South Park made up.

I bet there on the government watch list, right next to “KKK” and “Neo-Nazi”.

At least, I hope they are.

Posted by Roger on October 27, 2007, 01:51 AM report to moderator
dd

To me, race (muggle-born) and homosexuality are not the same. One is amoral (race). The other has alot of moral issues. Its an act people do. So, to me someone who believes a race is inferior just has immoral stands to begin with. Someone who believes homosexuality is morally wrong has decent stand. I don’t thing either muggle-borns or gays should be discriminated against. I mean is not like hetersexuals are not living in sin. Most of them have sex before marriage which is morally wrong too, but no one treats them wrong because of it, or calls them names. That is why I think supporting laws against gays is being two-faced, but you can teach your child the morals you see fit, and to treat people right. So in another word live and let live (I think thats how the phrase goes). That is what I believe.

Posted by dd on October 27, 2007, 02:09 AM report to moderator
KB Prez

“The story by Beppie is based on the supposition that homosexual actions are not wrong, so he compared it with being a Muggle-born. Now let’s do a very quick comparison using something people generally think is wrong as the revealed fact about Beedle:”

@Eippeb, I think your distortion of Beppie’s story is very sad.

I’m curious why you chose pedophiles. You could have substituted murderers or batterers for example. But then, your only purpose here is to rage against gay people. Murderers and batterers just wouldn’t have the effect you’re looking for, would they?

Anti-Gay Indoctrination Tool #1: Take every opportunity to equate homosexuals with child molesters. It gets all those non-thinking suckers out there every time.

VERY SAD.

Posted by KB Prez on October 27, 2007, 02:26 AM report to moderator
Eippeb

@Beppie: You said that ”...the issue of pedophelia does NOT work as an analogy as it involves the abuse of people who are too young to consent to sexual activity.”

I agree that there are differences between pedophilia and homosexuality (and I said so in my previous post). But your personalized version of the prejudice against muggle-borns is also different from the issue of homosexuality (and I also said so in my previous post).

One of the differences is that, in the real world, those who consider homosexual sex as something wrong think it is wrong regardless of who is doing it (_the problem is the act, not the person). In your personalized Potterverse, however, the usage of magic is only considered wrong when used by certain people. It is who is doing magic (and not really the act) that matters in your imagined example.

I am sure I could list other differences by further reflecting about your analogy. The bottom line is that if the issue of pedophilia does not work as an analogy because of some differences, then your Mudblood analogy does not work also.

Posted by Eippeb on October 27, 2007, 02:34 AM report to moderator
Beppie

Actually, homosexuality is not an act, it’s an orientation. Of course, actually entering into a relationship with a person of the same sex is an act—just as Muggle-borns entering into the wizarding world is an act.

Of course, you may believe that a stance against homosexuality is “decent”- but Mr. Malfoy in my little news item also believes that his stance is “decent”, becuase it is based upon texts that he believes are 100% true. Mind you, dd, you seem to be a lot more accepting than the Mr. Malfoy of my little news article. It’s just that I don’t think you can say that the two stances are different simply due to your personal belief that being opposed to homosexuality is “decent”- because Mr. Malfoy believes that his stance is “decent” too.

KB Prez, I’ve really enjoyed all your comments in this discussion (I’ve been reading for far longer than I have been commenting).

Posted by Beppie on October 27, 2007, 02:42 AM report to moderator
KB Prez

Beppie, I hope you will comment frequently. I think your story is absolutely awesome. I’d love to have your creative skills…I think I’m jealous. ):Smile.

Posted by KB Prez on October 27, 2007, 03:08 AM report to moderator
Eippeb

@ Beppie”: I assume you know that this “orientation” portion of homosexual behavior, (the romantic feelings or the desire some have for people of the same sex), is in no way considered a sin in the opinion of major Christian groups. Only gay “actions” are seen as wrong.

You said: “entering into a relationship with a person of the same sex is an act—just as Muggle-borns entering into the wizarding world is an act.”

I am not sure what you tried to say with the above statement, but it doesn’t change the difference I pointed in my last post. In your example, it is not really the “act of entering into the wizarding world” that is considered wrong, the real problem is who is doing so. I’d say your comparison doesn’t work for the same reason the old “racism comparison” does not work for today’s controversy over homosexuality.

Posted by Eippeb on October 27, 2007, 03:20 AM report to moderator
Eippeb

Beppie, I agree with KB Prez. You seem to be very creative. It is great that you are using this creativity to defend what you feel is right (even though I disagree with you in this specific issue).

Well, I need to go sleep. Goodbye.

Posted by Eippeb on October 27, 2007, 03:31 AM report to moderator
Beppie
Eippeb said: In your example, it is not really the “act of entering into the wizarding world” that is considered wrong, the real problem is who is doing so.

Well, it is the same in my analogy. People who think that homosexuality is wrong believe that it is okay for heterosexuals to form romantic relationships (both in a physical and emotional sense) with people that they are attracted to. But they believe that it is wrong for people attracted to members of the same sex to form such relationships: it’s not that you have a problem with people forming relationships, you just have a problem with WHO is doing so.

Having said that, however, my analogy is between the basis of Mr. Malfoy’s feelings, and the basis for claiming that homosexuality is wrong—both believe that these things are wrong because it’s how they’ve been raised, because it’s written in their holy texts, etc. Both genuinely believe that they are doing the decent thing. Ultimately, however, both of them promote views that mean that allow certain individuals to be denigrated and discriminated against.

I hope you have a good sleep. :)

Posted by Beppie on October 27, 2007, 03:57 AM report to moderator
Elvine

Beppie: I admire you for trying. Your analogy is of course excellent, but sometimes people are just too blinded by their own irrationality to listen to reason.

And yes, I judge racists and homophobes. Even more so if the views are based on something as personal (and illogical) as religion.

Posted by Elvine on October 27, 2007, 08:16 AM report to moderator
TJ

Leaky, I’ve been a fan of yours for many years now. I must commend you on your continued dedication to providing relevant, balanced information for your readers. I’ve come to believe that this commitment stems from an authentic interest in the Harry Potter community. The most trusted name in Potter, indeed.

Posted by TJ on October 27, 2007, 08:16 AM report to moderator
M Jones

But surely the whole point is not one of discrimination or prejudice. It is a biological reality that when hetrosexual people have sex, they have the means to further their own race. That cannot happen with homosexual sex. Hence – the very real difference between the acts that no form of political correctness or liberal fashion can deny.

Posted by M Jones on October 27, 2007, 09:10 AM report to moderator
Elvine

M jones:

“According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, infertility affects about 6.1 million people in the U.S., equivalent to ten percent of the reproductive age population.” (Wikipedia.org)

And women over 45 should not have sex either. No form of political correctness or liberal fashion can deny that, right?

Posted by Elvine on October 27, 2007, 09:16 AM report to moderator
Trick

I am completely surprised by the number of people who seem to think that a man can not love another man unless he is has sex with him or is gay. Some people are saying that this explains everything. Why DD would take five years to stop GG. I have three very good friends that I grew up with. I can honestly say that I love them, and I would do anything for them. Further it would take more than five years for me to come to the conclusion that I would have to kill one of them even if they were to do terrible things. I would tell myself that there were other authorities who are supposed to bring people to justice.

I know Jo has said that in her mind DD was gay, but it is up to each individual to interpret characters for themselves. Reading is one of those activities that allow you to believe anything you wish about a character. Jo may say that in her mind Harry is this way or that, but it’s how I read the character that is important. Now if Jo would have written love scenes between DD and GG it would be different. I can only conclude that she did not write such scenes into the books, because she wanted to leave it up to your interpretation as to why DD acted as he did. Again, I think she was careful to say that in HER mind DD was gay.

When I read the passages it did not even occur to me that DD acted this way, because he was gay. I just figured GG and DD had developed an intellectual relationship, and DD had bonded with him in the same way we all bond with boyhood or girlhood friends. The lack of a woman in DDs life was not curious to me. I just concluded that DD was above relationships, he had no equal with which to relate. That he had transcended sex in the same manner he had transcended the common view of death.

So I just say that if DD being gay upsets you, then let him not be gay in your mind. If DD being gay endears him more as a character to you, let him be gay. In the whole scheme of things sexual orientation is no more important to me than eye color or skin color. It is irrelevant.

Posted by Trick on October 27, 2007, 12:34 PM report to moderator
Rosa P

The overall trend of greater acceptance of gay men and women in the latter part of the 20th century was not limited to secular institutions; it was also seen in some religious institutions. Reform Judaism, the largest branch of Judaism outside Israel has begun to facilitate religious weddings for gay adherents in their synagogues. Jewish Theological Seminary, considered to be the flagship institution of Conservative Judaism, decided in March 2007 to begin accepting gay and lesbian applicants, after scholars who guide the movement lifted the ban on gay ordination.

In 2005, the United Church of Christ became the largest Christian denomination in the United States to formally endorse same-sex marriage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual

Gotta love wikipedia when you want to find something out!

Posted by Rosa P on October 27, 2007, 01:02 PM report to moderator
You must be logged in to MyLeaky to comment. Please click here to log in.
Why is Leaky YELLOW? Because Hufflepuff WON the House Cup! LeakyCon Live Album! The best wizard rock from LeakyCon on a two-disc set! Introducing MyLeaky! Your Harry Potter Social Network
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts! Cast spells and chat with your friends at the Chamber of Chat!

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 26 - Nov. 2009

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!

Guess That Book

Ron was pointing at the red envelope. It looked quite ordinary to Harry, but Ron and Neville were both looking at it as though they expected it to explode.[br]"What's the matter?" said Harry.[br]"She's -- she's sent me a Howler," said Ron faintly.


Introducing MyLeaky! Your Harry Potter Social Network Hosted by Idologic Inc.