MyLeaky Login

Join the largest Harry Potter Social Network on the Web! | FAQ

In the News

Leaky Interview with GLAAD (The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation)

Books
Posted by: Melissa
October 24, 2007, 06:45 PM

Since Friday evening's revelation that Prof. Dumbledore is gay, we've seen a lot of confused and oftentimes hurtful response and commentary on the topic. So, we called up GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, an organization that works specifically with the representation of gay characters and people in media, to help clarify some of the issues and talk about what this fact about Dumbledore means for our culture. A transcript of our interview with Sean Lund, the organization's director of Messaging and Communication Srategy, follows.

(Please again be reminded that debate is welcome but disrespectful, name-calling, hateful comments are being routinely deleted.)

~*~

The Leaky Cauldron: Thank you very much for taking the time to speak to us. Can you tell us more about GLAAD and what you do?

Sean Lund: GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, is an organization that has at its core the fundamental understanding that words and images matter, that what people see in the media has a really important impact on how they view the people in the world around them and how they treat the people in the world around them.

I think we have a really great opportunity here to have a longer discussion about Prof. Dumbledore, about the characteristics and the qualiites that he embodies and to talk about the fact that one of the most beloved people in the Harry Potter series is gay.

TLC: What's the reaction been like for you?

SL: Most of the reaction that we've been hearing from folks as we've been talking about it with various media outlets has been very positive. We've seen, as I'm sure a number of your readers have, some of the message boards at The Leaky Cauldron and elsewhere that have been largely very supportive of J.K. Rowling's decision. There have been some of those who have seized on the opporutnity that the conversation provides to engage in some stereotypes and some slightly unkind behavior, but overall I think the conversation has been positive.

TLC: What do you think is the most important thing to urge people to remember as they are dealing with this revelation?

SL: I think it's important to remember that Prof. Dumbledore is exactly the same wise, loyal, kind character that those of us who have been reading the books have always known. He still embodies generosity and integrity and courage and the importance of protecting others. Just because he happens to be gay doesn't make him better and doesn't make him worse. It's just one of the parts of who that character is, which his exactly what being gay is in the real world: it's just a part of what makes each of us unique and each of us different.

TLC: One of the things we're noticing is that there are some real misconceptions out there about what it means when you say that somebody is gay. There is a bias toward, an unfortunate assumption that gay means other things, such as child molestation and pedophile. Is this common?

SL: I think any time you're dealing with the misconceptions and myths and stereotypes about gay people you tend to be coming from a place of ignorance or more commonly fear about what it is like to be gay. I think one of the most important messages of the Harry Potter books is how fear, whether it's fear of what's different, whether it's fear of losing power, whether it's fear of change, can lead people to do and say things that are at best unkind and at worst sometimes even dangerous.

Some of the comments that we've seen about Prof. Dumbledore and some of the other comments that we've seen over the past several days relating to this story have kind of crept into those areas of stereotypes and misconceptions, and I think that the really valuable thing that folks like you and other folks that are really Harry Potter fans and other folks in the media are doing, is really raising the level of conversation so that those stereotypes and myths aren't allowed to go unchallenged.

TLC: Can you remember a recent time when another fictional character has been revealed as gay that has had this kind of impact?

SL: I think that probably the one that springs to mind most readily is the character of Willow on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," back, I think it was probably about six years or so ago now when [the show's creator,] Joss Whedon, who revealed in a very gradual way and in a way incredibly authentic for that character that she was gay and introduced her girlfriend Tara, and the two of them became a really wonderful couple on that show. That was a really perfect exmaple of how to do this sort of storytelling and how to create these characters right. When you take a look at how the audience reacted to that, there was such an investment in those characters and in that relationship. The Willow and Tara relationship became in some ways the moral center of that show.

I think very much with how J.K. Rowling has brought Dumbledore out, I think that sort of quality of maintaining the authenticity and maintaining the truth of the character really goes a long way in terms of making sure people stay invested in those characters, and in fact that people could keep even more invested and feel like they have additional points of identification with those characters.

TLC: The Willow comparison also touches on something else - we've been getting a little backlash from gay people as well, who complain that it's yet another gay character killed or was lonely (Tara, Willow's girlfriend is shot in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"). Is this a common theme in gay culture as represented in the media?

SL: I think that we have definitely seen some of that criticism and I tend to think about the fact that for many people who have read these books since the very beginning - I happened to come in around the time book three was published - for many readers who are coming into these stories now, they are coming into a series of books where the character of Dumbledore will always have been known to be gay. There are other people who just finished the series with the release of Deathly Hallows who are now able to go back as readers have been doing since the books came out, and go back into the stories and view the characters through this new revelations that have been in the new book or in J.K. Rowling's recent interviews and really come to a deeper and richer understanding of these characters.

J.K. Rowling's revelations, could they possibly have happened in the books? I'm not sure, you'd have to ask her. What you'll see is that she set the stage for all readers of these books, be they those who have already finished them and those who have yet to pick up even the first book, to have a deeper and richer interaction with these characters.

TLC: This is the largest, most popular fantasy series of all time, this is a huge and respected character. To make not just any character but Dumbledore, the kind brilliant professor, Dumbledore, gay - is there any way to quantify what this means to the way that gay people have been portrayed in the media or accepted in culture?

SL: At the heart of GLAAD's initiative is a very simple idea, that words and images matter, and I think the idea that J.K. Rowling would reveal that Prof. Dumbledore is gay sends a tremendously important message. It sends a message that heroes and people who we respect, and people that we look up to, come in all different shapes and sizes. And I think for the readers of the books, for the people who will see the movies in the future, I think that's a tremendously important message for them to carry forward.

TLC: Some parents are dealing now with children who are confused about what it is to be gay, and there are children confused because they are taught that it's bad, and they don't want to believe their parents who say that it's bad. What do you suggest parents do, and what do you suggest children whose parents aren't willing to talk to them, do to understand what this means?

SL: I think a lot of that ties back to what we were talking about earlier, which is that a lot of these stereotypes and myths and misconceptions about gay people really are borne out of a lack of knowledge and more specifically a fear of things that are different and people that are different. I think that when you look back at the Harry Potter books, one of J.K. Rowlng's most important themes is about treating people with dignity and respect.

I think one of the most important themes of the Harry Potter books is J.K. Rowling's message about making sure that we treat all people, whether they are the same as us, or whether they are different than us, with dignity and respect. If you think about it, one of the central conceits of the books is that there are purebloods, and muggles and half-bloods, and there is constantly some conflict among those, particularly among those who fear and hate those who are different, and in one very vivid example of that, would call them mudbloods. That's the sort of unkind language, the sort of stereotypes and sort of misconceptions that really do lead people to mistreat and dehumanize others.

You think about Prof. Dumbledore. Even before any of us knew that Prof. Dumbledore was gay, I think that we can agree that his character would never have approved of mistreating or abusing others or thinking ill of others. Now that we know that he's gay I think it's a very important reminder that whether you're straight or gay or are in the process of figuring that out, being the kind of person who treats others with love and dignity and respect, who looks out for other people, who stands up for them, and who protects them, is really what being a good person and good friend is all about.

TLC: What do you think the overarching impact of this revelation will be on the culture going forward?

SL: When a character like Prof. Dumbledore is revealed to be gay I think it has a tremendously influential impact of readers of all ages. J.K. Rowling's decision to allow readers to see Dumbledore for all of who he is, and I think also as importantly, her determination to preserve the authenticity of his character both in the films and the books, is going to enrich the power of these stories for generations to come.

I think that this provides a really great opportunity to remind ourselves and for readers of the books to remind themselves about one of the key themes of the Harry Potter series, and that is how fear of what is different can really lead people to do things that are unkind or dangerous and also at the same time elevate the sort of person that people really want to be in terms of the way they treat others. When you hear someone on the playground say "You're so gay," or, "That's so gay," that's a word that they're using as an insult. They're trying to hurt another person and make themselves feel bigger by making other people feel smaller.

Even before Ms. Rowling revealed that Prof. Dumbledore was gay I can't imagine that his character would ever have approved of mistreating or abusing others. And now that we know he's gay it really is an especially important reminder that whether you're gay or straight, treating other people with dignity and respect really is one of the most important values that we all can share.

~*~

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent Books News

419 Comments

TAD

I really enjoyed reading this interview, but I hesitate to think that there is much to go back and read further into as far as Dumbledore’s character goes. JKR herself said that she never intentionally alluded to his feelings for Grindelwald too strongly in the books. What we have to go on is backstory that she has provided us and is not exactly in print.

Posted by TAD on October 24, 2007, 08:17 PM report to moderator
xyz

Melissa, do you think that the opinion that does not hate or insult gays, but still thinks that homosexualism is not moral, and opposes gay-marriage, is legitimate?

Posted by xyz on October 24, 2007, 08:18 PM report to moderator
SteamPunk

I don’t like the idea of a gay Dumbledor, but he is what he is. It’s easy to tell the world he’s a homosexual after the series is concluded. It would have taken real courage to make that revelation in the text or before the series was over

Posted by SteamPunk on October 24, 2007, 08:20 PM report to moderator
Marauder

“Even before any of us knew that Prof. Dumbledore was gay, I think that we can agree that his character would never have approved of mistreating or abusing others or thinking ill of others.”

Well, he was willing to let Harry die, but, you know…

I still think that seeing as Dumbledore’s past history with Grindelwald was so important in DH, it should have been in the book. I’ve already thought of two different ways it could have fit in without sticking out like “Oh my God, stop the whole plot, Dumbledore’s gay!”, and I think that if Harry’s reaction hadn’t overshadowed the plot, the people for whom Dumbledore being gay did overshadow the plot would have had that as their problem and not the book’s.

Posted by Marauder on October 24, 2007, 08:20 PM report to moderator
Melissa

In general it’s a legitimate opinion, however, we’re not presenting sides of an issue here to determine whether it’s OK that JK Rowling says he’s gay. She does say he’s gay, and we’re not arguing that fact or trying to reach a public consensus. The issue isn’t whether he is, or whether it’s right – the issue is that he IS, and how to most responsibly handle that fact. If you can find a noninsulting way of responsibly handling that that is at odds with this viewpoint, then that’s OK. We’re not presenting an interview that says that homosexuality is wrong – that’s not the issue. We’re not trying to determine whether this was a right or moral choice for JKR to make: We are dealing with the fact that she made it, and how to responsibly handle that now.

Posted by Melissa on October 24, 2007, 08:23 PM report to moderator
SteamPunk

Marauder makes a very good point.

Posted by SteamPunk on October 24, 2007, 08:24 PM report to moderator
cara

Melissa, and all at Leaky, you just keep getting better! Thank you for having such a wonderful approach to all you do :)

Posted by cara on October 24, 2007, 08:28 PM report to moderator
Velse

I don’t think that people who express prejudice against other people for being just what they are-for example, african american, female, lithuanian, or anything at all-can be said to have an opposing “viewpoint”. It’s not a point of view, it’s a negation of what another person is. To try to distinguish between a moral objection to homosexuality and a bigoted objection to homosexuals is contortionist pseudo-PC blather. In my opinion.

Posted by Velse on October 24, 2007, 08:29 PM report to moderator
Velse

Sorry about the strikethrough. I was trying for an em dash!

Posted by Velse on October 24, 2007, 08:30 PM report to moderator
SeaJay

It is heart warming to see how well Leaky (and Mugglenet) have handled the whole issue. Bravo well-done.

Someone requested ‘balance’ in the views expressed and Melissa addressed that directly with two comments.

To me there is ‘another side’ of the argument that has already been touched on, but I want to mention again and that is: once the book has been written and published it takes on a life of its own. It has grown up and moved away from home. Its parent, the author, needs to let go and move on.

If the author has not stated or implied something in the book itself then the reader is bound to fill in the blanks with their own imagination. The reader cannot be expected to have researched every interview with the author, so as to know the author’s own opinions on all aspects of their work.

Posted by SeaJay on October 24, 2007, 08:33 PM report to moderator
Rachel

Melissa, Interviewing someone from one of the most militant gay rights groups on this site does in a sense constitute siding with them. It would be appropriate to at least interview someone like John Granger, Nancy Brown, or the folks at Sword of Gryffindor on this issue. I know to many stories about how GLAAD is not just advocating tolerance of gays but are trying to change the way people feel about their religion, their culture, etc. For some reason, only the Christian views are the “intolerant” ones and are not fit to be heard by anyone since they are not “PC”. What about tolerating other view points. Concerning the Dumbledore issue: I was suprised at first but I thought about it and it does make sense in the light of what we find out about him in DH. However, it seems that this was an obsessive infatuation (JK’s words) that lead to destruction (ie. Ariana’s death and his estrangement from his brother). Does Dumbledore see this relationship that he had in a good light? No, he doesn’t. He makes it very clear that he was very foolish and that he had abandoned his family to hatch plans for wizard domination with Grindelwald. This is supposed to be a celebrated gay relationship? A victory for gay rights? How? When an author finishes their work…they don’t own it anymore. It can be interpreted in any way that the reader wishes to. She has said in another interview that she didn’t mean for this information to come out in the books since it wasn’t relevant to the overall plot of the story. This is background information that helps the auther to understand the character’s motivations..nothing more. Since there is no mention of any homosexuality in the books..it can be interepreted that this wasn’t a “gay” relationship. In fact, an editorial for Time magazine has come out saying that this is hardly a victory for gay rights at all. But for this site to be fair and tolerant, I think you should have an interview with a Christian, preferably one who has read the books several times, who is a fan, etc to see what they think instead of only going to gay lobbying groups like GLAAD who have a clear political agenda.

Posted by Rachel on October 24, 2007, 08:35 PM report to moderator
Angela*

well i was honestly just shocked when i found out, but it wasnt bad shock, nor good..just shock! lol, but this doesnt matter to me, i mean, he’s still dumbledore!

Posted by Angela* on October 24, 2007, 08:35 PM report to moderator
always_a_sidekick

It is difficult for me to express in words the pride and joy I felt when I saw this interview. Really, there’s not much to be said that hasn’t been covered already. I agree that there is no “opposing viewpoint”; the interview expressed excitement and approval at the presence of another positive gay image. As Sean said, the core of their work is that words and images matter. What could be the opposing viewpoint to any of this article? I don’t understand how you can claim that posting just this isn’t fair. JKR said he was gay. Fact. Images and words matter in the perception of the subject. Fact. What would an opposing viewpoint be? Would we be asking for another viewpoint if JKR had said he was of a different race or religion?

Anyway, that’s been covered by Melissa here in the comments. Twice. I’m just writing to agree that yes, as a gay man, I find this revelation to be a positive one. I think much of the anger and agitation with it comes from the embedded idea that because he didn’t fall into a gay stereotype that it’s in some way deceitful or bad. Because Dumbledore isn’t Jack McFarland, he’s not the network approved, family-friendly gay. I agree with the statement that because we didn’t know, the fact is made more real.

His sexual orientation has no bearing on the quality of his character. He still made the decisions he made, spoke the wisdom of his years, and wielded the massive power he controlled. He was still incredibly human, and so much the better. I think, if anything, it’s a huge insight to how much more of his life included pain and loss. Jo was asked if he had ever deeply loved. She said yes… and it was a man. Which given the time he lived in and the outcome of that relationship makes him even more human than one could imagine.

Yes. I’m proud of this interview. I’m proud to work for a website (yup, I’m a staffer) that sees the importance of exhibiting a mature and educational way to present this material to its fans in such a way that hate and defamation can hopefully be curtailed. And if you’re really still wanting to get angry about this particular interview, well… homosexuals aren’t the only group of people with an organization watching their backs against defamation… and these other groups were openly represented in these books without anyone batting an eye.

-Josh

Posted by always_a_sidekick on October 24, 2007, 08:38 PM report to moderator
Two-HeadedBoy

What’s exactly the difference between not insulting/hating homosexuality and calling it amoral? Is being called amoral NOT an insult? Is it not hateful? “Oh you’re ok but this huge part of who you are is amoral and despicable.” How does that even work?

That said, I applaud Leaky on its responsible treatment of the entire situation. The GLAAD interview is exactly the type of thing that should be following this revelation.

Posted by Two-HeadedBoy on October 24, 2007, 08:40 PM report to moderator
StraightAlbus

“being gay” is WRONG!-that’s still my oppinion no matter what this interview says! ...Dumbledore is sadly begining to lack style :( *So Albus will always remain straight in my head.

Posted by StraightAlbus on October 24, 2007, 08:41 PM report to moderator
You must be logged in to MyLeaky to comment. Please click here to log in.
Why is Leaky YELLOW? Because Hufflepuff WON the House Cup! LeakyCon Live Album! The best wizard rock from LeakyCon on a two-disc set! Introducing MyLeaky! Your Harry Potter Social Network
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts!

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 26 - Nov. 2009

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!

Guess That Book

"I'm -- er -- not supposed ter do magic, strictly speakin'."

Cast spells and chat with your friends at the Chamber of Chat!

Introducing MyLeaky! Your Harry Potter Social Network Hosted by Idologic Inc.