Definitely voted Rowling, but perhaps it’s because I spent far too long studying Dickens at school and it got a bit too formalised for me, though I do still enjoy it a little. I suppose in some ways it may be premature to compare the two writers, but I can see where there might be similarities to look at. Their popularity and their slightly contentious ‘literary’ value in the eyes of their academic contemporaries has to be taken into account. They are also both acute social commentators, and there are even parallels in the way that they characterise in their work. I would perhaps rank Rowling higher because her work is a little more nuanced. There’s never usually anything subtle about Dickens, and the style suits him well, but it does make Rowling more palatable.
Dickens was in my belief a great social comentator of the disgusting and appauling conditions that were “life” for most people in the country. Jo writes about a different view of life dealing with good vs evil. There can be no comparison ! For the rest of the poll it would not be possible to have the latter without the contribution that the former had made to their field of life.
it’s not about who’s the best writer in general, it’s about who’s the most visionary of the two. And i think that in that particular respect JKR does beat Dickens
What do they mean by visionary? Because Dickens was more a social commentator wasn’t he?
oh I see Flittwick has already said this, but I’ll post it anyway :)
Incidentally, Dickens always adapts exceptionally well to TV drama or film. Maybe that’s the ‘visionary’ in him; he saw film potential ahead of his time!
I am a HUGE fan of Jo Rowling and her wonderful books.The Harry Potter novels have greatly influenced my personality and are forever linked with my childhood.I consider them a great piece of literature and I strongly believe that they will be read countless times by the future generations as well,but I also DO think that Jo’s work and way of writing have not achieved enough maturity to be compared to the work of Charles Dickens. I voted for him and I dare say that Jo Rowling would have done the same…I am looking forward to the future projects of Mrs.Rowling and I am confident that her books will ever improve and even surpass Mr.Dickens!I have one thing to say to those BBCworld people who came up with this idea:”too soon people!!”
It’s not fair to compare the two. But.. for all that Dickens accomplished, I’d have to vote for him.
He was the FIRST author to sell his books for prices low enough so the everyone could buy them. Before Dickens, people only had the Bible or if they were richer, Pilgrim’s Progress. But Dickens spread reading to everyone.
I am sure that in a few hundred years, JKR will be as big as Dickens. Yes, her fandom is huge and she wrote one of my favorite stories of all time.
But Dickens literally changed the world.
I adore the Harry Potter series but I cannot believe JK is beating Dickens, shows what happens when a poll like this is revealed to fans like this who will vote purely cos they love the Potter series and not about who the better visionary was (as asked). Sad. JK’s a great writer but she’s only had 7 books published and while they are wonderful we don’t know how popular they will be in another centuary.
I could NOT have said it any better Peeved. There is NO comparison between Dickens and Rowling. I love HP dearly, but Jo has a LONG way to go before she can be considered in the same company as Dickens. This vote is based purely on current popularity rather than who is more deserving of the recognition. It’s really sad that this is even being done, for fun or not. Kinda disrespectful if you ask me.
Actually, seeing as Jo herself is a HUGE Dicken’s fan, she’d be disappointed if we didn’t vote for him methinks…
Jo’s winning now unsurprisingly, but it is a little silly. Jo’s books are better as far as I’m concerned, as is a lot of modern storytelling. I’m very critical of books from past times when put alongside modern storytelling principles. That said, we’re asked who is the best visionary, which is quite different. How can Jo beat Dickens in that category? That’s a little nuts imo.
What bugs me the most is Mozart vs Madonna though. I mean, come ON. Did Madonna completely change the face of music for the next century? I don’t buy it. Is she a genius? Hardly; she had the right people, who were in the right places at the right times. I’m not knocking Madonna. She is what she is. But how she gets 80% on Mozart… that’s just stupid.
Mozart vs Madonna? are you kidding me. Madonna has not even done what michael jackson accomplished. what are they thinking?
I haven’t read any of Dicken’s books (I will eventually), but I know that Dickens has to have done some great work. I’m not saying Jo’s a bad writer, and I really enjoy her books, but she’s not as great of a writer as people say. I’m not hating on jo at all, I’m just saying. Harry Potter is only one series, and JKR plans to continue writing. Her style will probably improve in the future.
I think that it’s outrageous that Jo has 71% of the votes and Dickens has 29%. While it is a matter of opinion (if you really think that Jo’s “visionary” or whatever is better, then that’s fine), I’m sure that a lot of votes for Jo come from people who are just huge fans of the books. Seriously, I can’t stand people who act like Harry Potter is the only great book series in the world. There’s nothing wrong with really loving the books, but it is wrong if it gets to the point where you won’t read anything else, or if you consider every other book inferior to Harry Potter without having read them.
guys one of the other polls pitts mozart against madonna, don’t take it so seriously.