In The News

Rumor Alert: Spielberg and a Two Part "Deathly Hallows" Film

Rumor
Posted by: Sue
January 12, 2008, 11:20 PM

Hang on everyone, there is a new rumor tonight regarding famous directors and a possible two part Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows film. The Daily Mail is reporting tonight that crews currently working on “Half-Blood Prince” have been told the final Harry Potter film “will be released in two halves.” The article then points out while the financial benefit would be significant (“it could mean a £500million bonus in ticket sales”) the paper reports this purported move is artistic, citing an unnamed source who says:

“There’s so much to fit that the view is the last movie should be in two halves. There is a huge battle when Harry, played by Daniel Radcliffe, takes on Voldemort that needs to be done really well.”

The article then goes on to cite that Warner Bros, which has still not formally announced a director for the final film, is considering some big name directors for the final movie, including legendary Oscar winning director Steven Spielberg. Quotage: At Warner Bros, who are rumoured to be thinking of Oscars and a big-name director such as Steven Spielberg for the final film, a spokesman said: “People are discussing all possibilities.”

Readers will remember, and as cited by J.K. Rowling on her website, Steven Spielberg had considered directing the first Harry Potter film, but declined. As we have reported previously as well, other names have surfaced in regards to directing “Deathly Hallows” including Alfonso Cuaron, David Yates, Chris Columbus, and most recently Guillermo Del Toro. As exciting as all of this sounds, please keep this one very much in the rumor category for the time being. We are trying to verify this, and will update with more when we can.

Thanks mc and rodeo!

rate this article

Interested in Rumor?

Sign up for free Email Alerts


Comments (457) | Average 3.5 (447 votes) Browse all Recent Rumor News
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 
Sam

Who ever doesn’t want this join my facebook group – Don’t Split our DH!

http://hs.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7567169261

Posted by Sam on January 13, 2008 @ 01:45 PM
Leggers

I just have this strange feeling that this is going to be one of those huge rumors that is going to be completely squashed by WB, or whoever, within the next few days. The whole thing just seems a bit fishy to me. I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

Posted by Leggers on January 13, 2008 @ 01:46 PM
Nashiba

I’ve been saying this to anyone who would listen since they made movie three. And not just about the last one, about all of the ones that followed the third. And I still think they should’ve done the same with GOF, OOTP and HBP.

Posted by Nashiba on January 13, 2008 @ 01:52 PM
Coughdrop

is it just me or does this sound scarily familiar??

Didn’t this same rumor come out about GoF? Or am I crazy?

Posted by Coughdrop on January 13, 2008 @ 02:03 PM
Rhiannon

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When Spielberg was involved before SS he was making a pig’s ear out of the project. I would rather see it not done than done by him! And two parts BAH!

Posted by Rhiannon on January 13, 2008 @ 02:03 PM
Muddtallica

Lily – Whether you liked GoF or not is a matter of your own personal opinion, but to say that it was “the most slated by critics” is absolute rot, I’m afraid. Rotten Tomatoes puts it at an 89% critical approval rating, tied with PoA as the best-reviewed film to date…check for yourself if you don’t believe me. http://64.14.20.205/m/harry_potter_and_the_goblet_of_fire/

Also, there’s been so much drivel spouted in this topic about Spielberg, it’s untrue. No heart? Kiddy? This is Steven Spielberg we’re on about, one of the most acclaimed and respected directors alive today, author of one of the most diverse and consistently interesting bodies of work I can think of, from action adventure (Indiana Jones) to thriller (Jaws, Duel) to kids adventure (ET) to drama (Schindler’s, Private Ryan, Munich) to sci-fi (AI, Minority Report) to light comedy (The Terminal, Catch Me If You Can)...need I go on? He’s a versatile, consummate showman, with a superb visual sense, brilliant grasp of pacing and plotting, excellent handle on effects, wonderful control over actors…to me, the idea that he wouldn’t be up to directing DH is laughable. I don’t think he’d be interested, personally, but he’d be a suerb choice if he was.

Posted by Muddtallica on January 13, 2008 @ 02:05 PM
KarenO

I love Steven Spielberg, he’s fantastic, but I don’t think he’d be the right one to direct Deathly Hallows. And I also hate the idea of having two movies. Fans will certainly not be happy about it…I’d rather have one long movie…splitting it in two would make fans very unhappy, which I would’ve thought is something Jo certainly does not want…even if it does mean a slightly smaller pay check.

Posted by KarenO on January 13, 2008 @ 02:14 PM
Zach

Yes to the two-part film (provided we have to wait less than a year and no more than six months in between each one) but a huge-massively gargantuan NO to Speilberg (or Peter Jackson for that matter). Hardcore yes to Yates, Del Toro, or Terry Gilliam-even though we know that’s probably never, ever going to happen.

Posted by Zach on January 13, 2008 @ 02:30 PM
Zach

Sorry for the double post, but that crosing out above was not intentional.

Posted by Zach on January 13, 2008 @ 02:31 PM
M  Jones

“Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows -The Three Brothers” (To the death of Dobby;)

“Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows -The Battle of Hogwarts”

2 films -each of 140 minutes -directed by one of the greatest directors in the history of cinema….

Wow !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

All of prayers would be answered =Finally a movie that does the books justice.

Posted by M Jones on January 13, 2008 @ 02:41 PM
djm19

No way should they have Fran Walsh on screenplay. Her liberties with the LOTR raw material would make Harry Potter fans twinge with agony (compared to Goldenberg and Kloves)

Posted by djm19 on January 13, 2008 @ 02:41 PM
JMG

If they did do two parts they should wait to release both together like maybe like a month apart. kinda of like when they re-released the Star Wars Movies

Posted by JMG on January 13, 2008 @ 02:46 PM
susu

ok first …. 2 PARTS?!!!! are u kidding … well if they follow the story line better than in the other films its ok with me if not well that sucks ….. second …. STEVEN SPILBERG??!!! r u kidding this is not a film of how global warming is about to cause the world to end so i dont think he is right for this movie…..

Posted by susu on January 13, 2008 @ 03:04 PM
ygrfhkginv

yeahhhhhhhh plz pzl plz make a 2 part movie it will be the best and steven speillberg is a greattttttttttt choice

Posted by ygrfhkginv on January 13, 2008 @ 03:07 PM
ygrfhkginv

yeahhhhhhhh plz pzl plz make a 2 part movie it will be the best and steven speillberg is a greattttttttttt choice

Posted by ygrfhkginv on January 13, 2008 @ 03:07 PM
emily?

i hope they make the movie in two parts so that they don’t have to make any STUPID cuts that RUIN The movie. <sigh>. and i hope they don’t use any directions they’ve used in the past, the movies have been good but they just don’t live up to my standards (like they ever could, I’m a HUGGGEEEE fan-like most of you…haha)

the 7th movie better be good or i’m gonna hurt someone

=]

Posted by emily? on January 13, 2008 @ 03:11 PM
M  Jones

One thing is interesting at least. With the exception of the release of book 7 and the Dumbledore business, this one topic has already generated more posts than anything else over the past 12 months in a comparable time frame.

To my mind -this illustrates how mind blowing this proposition is.

Posted by M Jones on January 13, 2008 @ 03:24 PM
DeathlyH

No. No Steven Spielberg. No two parts. I want one big huge 5-hour Harry Potter movie directed by Guillermo Del Toro!!!!!!!!

Posted by DeathlyH on January 13, 2008 @ 03:32 PM
AMG

Given the source, I expect this rumor is false… but I’d be pretty happy if it were true! I think it would be ideal for the movie to be 3.5 hours long, but splitting it makes sense to me if it could allow them to do the plot justice (unlike in all five films to date). Lord of the Rings is all one continuous story, and I don’t see anybody freaking out because it was published and the movie was made in three volumes. And HBP and DH are pretty much the same story as it stands, but the break in the plot at the end of the sixth book felt right. I’m sure there are plenty of logical parts where DH could be split. And I hope we get Spielberg, that would be great!

Posted by AMG on January 13, 2008 @ 03:38 PM
Jennifer

There’s no reason why DH would need to be a 2 part movie. WB is totally capable of making it a satisfying film, regardless of what they may need to cut or rearrange. And I doubt Spielberg was even considered…he was supposed to direct the first film, then had a tantrum because JK Rowling didn’t want him to butcher her story like he was planning to. He’s a hack director anyway. If Spielberg gets his hands on the Harry Potter franchise, it will go to sh* for sure. He’ll change the whole story to make it an alien movie.

Posted by Jennifer on January 13, 2008 @ 03:43 PM
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23 

Sorry, comments are closed for this article.

PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to listen! Join us at LeakyCon 2009! Learn more today! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films

The Leaky Cauldron is not associated with J.K. Rowling, Warner Bros., or any of the individuals or companies associated with producing and publishing Harry Potter books and films.
"The Leaky Song" by Brad Mehlenbacher of Draco and the Malfoys