In the News

Followup: JK Rowling Wins Appeal on Child Photo Privacy Case

News
Posted by: Sue
May 07, 2008, 05:22 PM

Previously we told you of a legal matter involving author J.K. Rowling and photographs of her young 18 month old son that were published in a UK paper several years ago. In effort to protect their privacy of their young children, the case went to court, and today Jo and her husband Dr. Neil Murray won an appeal that would ban further publication of photographs. According to the BBC, the couple released a statement about this matter, stating:

“We understand and accept that with the success of Harry Potter there will be a measure of legitimate media and public interest in Jo’s professional activities and appearances. However, we have striven to give our children a normal family life outside the media spotlight. We are immensely grateful to the court for giving our children protection from covert, unauthorised photography; this ruling will make an immediate and material difference to their lives.”

In making the ruling, one of the judges involved said “If a child of parents who are not in the public eye could reasonably expect not to have photographs of him published in the media, so too should the child of a famous parent. In our opinion, it is at least arguable that a child of ‘ordinary’ parents could reasonably expect that the press would not target him and publish photographs of him.”

Reuters also reports an attorney for J.K. Rowling reflected on the impact this ruling will have for the media in the UK, as he is quoted as saying this case will have a “profound effect … on certain sections of the paparazzi.This case establishes a law of privacy for children in those cases where, understandably, the parents wish to protect their children from intrusive photography by the paparazzi,” he said. “I am sure that the overwhelming majority of the media will welcome it.”

Thanks to the many who emailed!

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent News News

31 Comments

Sheri

I’m so glad that the courts made the correct decision to protect the privacy of Jo & Neil’s children. It’s unfortunate that in the state of our world today that many paparazzi and journalists have no sense of propriety any more regarding what civilized behavior is.

Posted by Sheri on May 07, 2008, 05:37 PM report to moderator
MuggleQueen

Woop 2nd comment!!

At least Jo is having some legal luck at the moment.

Posted by MuggleQueen on May 07, 2008, 05:38 PM report to moderator
tintanktonks

Im glad Jo pursued this. Every parent has the right to protect their children. : )

Posted by tintanktonks on May 07, 2008, 05:38 PM report to moderator
Hannah

Wow congrations

Posted by Hannah on May 07, 2008, 05:43 PM report to moderator
Courtney

I’m glad Jo won something in court. This case should have been a no-brainer. It’s intrusive and dangerous to publish photos of a celebrity’s child.

I’m glad you won Neil and Jo!

Posted by Courtney on May 07, 2008, 05:45 PM report to moderator
rotfang07

YES, YES and YES !!!! WOOOOpeeeeee for JKR. At last, one in the eye for the loathsome paparazzi. May it be the first of many triumphs for JKR this summer.

Posted by rotfang07 on May 07, 2008, 06:02 PM report to moderator
RosieWeasley

Yeah! Maybe this will be the first of multiple victories for Jo this summer.

Posted by RosieWeasley on May 07, 2008, 06:12 PM report to moderator
Hazel

Glad to hear that sense won out in this case, and that Jo and Neil’s children can lead a paparazzi-free life now. Just hope the judge can see sense in the Lexicon book case now.

Posted by Hazel on May 07, 2008, 06:16 PM report to moderator
j

wohoo!

Excellent news. Children should be allowed to remain children away from the spotlight.

Posted by j on May 07, 2008, 06:16 PM report to moderator
Nora

This is so great! I’ve been waiting for this. This verdict means a great deal for childrens rights. I hope the press (that is to say, certain parts of the press) in other countries will take notice and show greater respect for childen – who ever their parents are!

Posted by Nora on May 07, 2008, 06:18 PM report to moderator
babycakes

I supported her in this one and rightly so. However, I dont support her case against the Lexicon.

Posted by babycakes on May 07, 2008, 06:28 PM report to moderator
Lexi

Way to go Mr. and Mrs. Murray! If they don’t ask your permission, they should not be able to publish photos of underage children.

Posted by Lexi on May 07, 2008, 06:39 PM report to moderator
Rachel *

This is good. I’m glad Jo fought it further. More celebs should do this.

Although I’m surprised it was a UK paper not an international since I thought that in the UK publications including magazines like Hello and OK!, they had to always blur the faces of celeb kids unlike the US publications.

Celeb kids are not famous. They are cute to look at but it’s not the point. The obsession the US mags have with for example Shiloh and Suri is over the top.

Posted by Rachel * on May 07, 2008, 06:54 PM report to moderator
matea

Steve is sooooooooooooo going down!

Posted by matea on May 07, 2008, 07:01 PM report to moderator
kevin

Oh my God! I remember this!

That’s one going on two court wins for Jo coming up!

Posted by kevin on May 07, 2008, 07:15 PM report to moderator
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! Join us at LeakyCon 2009! Learn more today! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 25 - Dec. 2008

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!
Cast spells and chat with your friends at the Chamber of Chat! Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts!

Hosted by Idologic Inc.