MyLeaky Login

Join the largest Harry Potter Social Network on the Web! | FAQ

In the News

New York Times Book Review of "The Casual Vacancy" (Spoiler Alert!) UPDATE

News
Posted by: Catherine
September 27, 2012, 06:41 AM

The New York Times released its first book review of The Casual Vacancy this morning (SPOILER ALERTS).The NYT states that the overall feeling of the book was emotionally disheartening: " The novel contains moments of genuine drama and flashes here and there of humor, but it ends on such a disheartening note ". The book is said to have "momentum" but it takes a while to get there. The reviewer, over all, was not very impressed with the novel, stating "it's dull", and did not feel Rowling's characterization. The New York TImes reports: 

Unfortunately, the real-life world she has limned in these pages is so willfully banal, so depressingly clichéd that “The Casual Vacancy” is not only disappointing — it’s dull. The novel — which takes place in the tiny, fictional English village of Pagford, and chronicles the political and personal fallout created by the sudden death of a member of the parish council named Barry Fairbrother — reads like an odd mash-up of a dark soap opera like “Peyton Place” with one of those very British Barbara Pym novels, depicting small-town, circumscribed lives.

This is definitely not a book for children[!]

As “The Casual Vacancy” trundles along and Ms. Rowling starts grappling with the consequences of her characters’ darker secrets, the narrative gathers momentum, but it takes a lot of pages to get there. In the meantime we are treated to tedious descriptions of the political squabbles exacerbated by Barry Fairbrother’s death and historical accounts of class tensions in insular Pagford — most notably a face-off between one faction that is opposed to a public housing project and a clinic for addicts, and another that has a sense of duty toward the less fortunate. It’s a subject with the potential to reverberate with an American audience — given the current battles between Republicans and Democrats over the role and size of government — but as laid out here it’s oddly bloodless and abstract.

We do not come away feeling that we know the back stories of the “Vacancy” characters in intimate detail the way we did with Harry and his friends and enemies, nor do we finish the novel with a visceral knowledge of how their pasts — and their families’ pasts — have informed their present lives. Of course, Ms. Rowling had seven volumes to map out the intricacies of the wizarding world in Harry Potter. The reader can only hope she doesn’t try to flesh out the Muggle world of Pagford in any further volumes, but instead moves on to something more compelling and deeply felt in the future
.

The rest of the review can be read here.

UPDATE: The Guardian responds to negative reviews, stating:

"The Casual Vacancy is no masterpiece, but it's not bad at all: intelligent, workmanlike, and often funny," said Theo Tait in the Guardian newspaper.

"The worst you could say about it, really, is that it doesn't deserve the media frenzy surrounding it. And who nowadays thinks that merit and publicity have anything do with each other?"

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent News News

7 Comments

Timeturner2_thumb
394 Points

Oh Dear. :-/

Posted by mariakingsford on September 27, 2012, 09:21 AM report to moderator
Hermione_grange_thumb
7605 Points

Wow ya they right that book is not for children :/

Posted by HarryPotterGirl (Hermione) on September 27, 2012, 09:38 AM report to moderator
Tumblr_mhtdm2xtoo1r5souzo7_250_thumb
20981 Points

I knew this book was going to be a let down, but I didnt think this much so. JK is going to have a long road ahead of her to reach the prized spot she once held with Harry Potter.

Posted by LunaLuver on September 27, 2012, 04:30 PM report to moderator
Casualvacanycover_2266306a_thumb
3455 Points

I don’t think she cares about her spot in society or in the literary world—I think she only cares about writing what she wants to write…

Posted by Catherine ( *SQUEE!*) on September 27, 2012, 04:45 PM report to moderator
Keeper_thumb
349 Points

I feel a bit sorry for her. But, could anything have lived up to Harry Potter? I still intend to read it. I have to wonder if the reviews would have been kinder if she had released the book under a different name…

Posted by AvanelleWood on September 29, 2012, 12:36 PM report to moderator
Raven_avatar_thumb
80418 Points

Alls I can say is, meh…

Posted by Won_Two on September 29, 2012, 12:51 PM report to moderator
Vdpqtmg_thumb
3266 Points

Wow, they were really harsh to her weren’t they? I don’t really judge books by what critics think so I’ll save my opinion for when I actually read it. Quite frankly, I don’t think she’s doing it for a spot in society, I think she wrote the book because she felt like it.

Posted by Acciobrooms on September 29, 2012, 09:47 PM report to moderator
You must be logged in to MyLeaky to comment. Please click here to log in.

Finding Hogwarts
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films Leaky Apps

Guess That Book

"Fred and George tried to get me to make [an Unbreakable Vow] when I was about five. I nearly did too, I was holding hands with Fred and everything when Dad found us. He went mental," said Ron, with a reminiscent gleam in his eyes. "Only time I've ever se

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 28 - Jul. 2014

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!
Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts!