In the News

Leaky Interview with GLAAD (The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation)

Books
Posted by: Melissa
October 24, 2007, 06:45 PM

Since Friday evening's revelation that Prof. Dumbledore is gay, we've seen a lot of confused and oftentimes hurtful response and commentary on the topic. So, we called up GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, an organization that works specifically with the representation of gay characters and people in media, to help clarify some of the issues and talk about what this fact about Dumbledore means for our culture. A transcript of our interview with Sean Lund, the organization's director of Messaging and Communication Srategy, follows.

(Please again be reminded that debate is welcome but disrespectful, name-calling, hateful comments are being routinely deleted.)

~*~

The Leaky Cauldron: Thank you very much for taking the time to speak to us. Can you tell us more about GLAAD and what you do?

Sean Lund: GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, is an organization that has at its core the fundamental understanding that words and images matter, that what people see in the media has a really important impact on how they view the people in the world around them and how they treat the people in the world around them.

I think we have a really great opportunity here to have a longer discussion about Prof. Dumbledore, about the characteristics and the qualiites that he embodies and to talk about the fact that one of the most beloved people in the Harry Potter series is gay.

TLC: What's the reaction been like for you?

SL: Most of the reaction that we've been hearing from folks as we've been talking about it with various media outlets has been very positive. We've seen, as I'm sure a number of your readers have, some of the message boards at The Leaky Cauldron and elsewhere that have been largely very supportive of J.K. Rowling's decision. There have been some of those who have seized on the opporutnity that the conversation provides to engage in some stereotypes and some slightly unkind behavior, but overall I think the conversation has been positive.

TLC: What do you think is the most important thing to urge people to remember as they are dealing with this revelation?

SL: I think it's important to remember that Prof. Dumbledore is exactly the same wise, loyal, kind character that those of us who have been reading the books have always known. He still embodies generosity and integrity and courage and the importance of protecting others. Just because he happens to be gay doesn't make him better and doesn't make him worse. It's just one of the parts of who that character is, which his exactly what being gay is in the real world: it's just a part of what makes each of us unique and each of us different.

TLC: One of the things we're noticing is that there are some real misconceptions out there about what it means when you say that somebody is gay. There is a bias toward, an unfortunate assumption that gay means other things, such as child molestation and pedophile. Is this common?

SL: I think any time you're dealing with the misconceptions and myths and stereotypes about gay people you tend to be coming from a place of ignorance or more commonly fear about what it is like to be gay. I think one of the most important messages of the Harry Potter books is how fear, whether it's fear of what's different, whether it's fear of losing power, whether it's fear of change, can lead people to do and say things that are at best unkind and at worst sometimes even dangerous.

Some of the comments that we've seen about Prof. Dumbledore and some of the other comments that we've seen over the past several days relating to this story have kind of crept into those areas of stereotypes and misconceptions, and I think that the really valuable thing that folks like you and other folks that are really Harry Potter fans and other folks in the media are doing, is really raising the level of conversation so that those stereotypes and myths aren't allowed to go unchallenged.

TLC: Can you remember a recent time when another fictional character has been revealed as gay that has had this kind of impact?

SL: I think that probably the one that springs to mind most readily is the character of Willow on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," back, I think it was probably about six years or so ago now when [the show's creator,] Joss Whedon, who revealed in a very gradual way and in a way incredibly authentic for that character that she was gay and introduced her girlfriend Tara, and the two of them became a really wonderful couple on that show. That was a really perfect exmaple of how to do this sort of storytelling and how to create these characters right. When you take a look at how the audience reacted to that, there was such an investment in those characters and in that relationship. The Willow and Tara relationship became in some ways the moral center of that show.

I think very much with how J.K. Rowling has brought Dumbledore out, I think that sort of quality of maintaining the authenticity and maintaining the truth of the character really goes a long way in terms of making sure people stay invested in those characters, and in fact that people could keep even more invested and feel like they have additional points of identification with those characters.

TLC: The Willow comparison also touches on something else - we've been getting a little backlash from gay people as well, who complain that it's yet another gay character killed or was lonely (Tara, Willow's girlfriend is shot in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"). Is this a common theme in gay culture as represented in the media?

SL: I think that we have definitely seen some of that criticism and I tend to think about the fact that for many people who have read these books since the very beginning - I happened to come in around the time book three was published - for many readers who are coming into these stories now, they are coming into a series of books where the character of Dumbledore will always have been known to be gay. There are other people who just finished the series with the release of Deathly Hallows who are now able to go back as readers have been doing since the books came out, and go back into the stories and view the characters through this new revelations that have been in the new book or in J.K. Rowling's recent interviews and really come to a deeper and richer understanding of these characters.

J.K. Rowling's revelations, could they possibly have happened in the books? I'm not sure, you'd have to ask her. What you'll see is that she set the stage for all readers of these books, be they those who have already finished them and those who have yet to pick up even the first book, to have a deeper and richer interaction with these characters.

TLC: This is the largest, most popular fantasy series of all time, this is a huge and respected character. To make not just any character but Dumbledore, the kind brilliant professor, Dumbledore, gay - is there any way to quantify what this means to the way that gay people have been portrayed in the media or accepted in culture?

SL: At the heart of GLAAD's initiative is a very simple idea, that words and images matter, and I think the idea that J.K. Rowling would reveal that Prof. Dumbledore is gay sends a tremendously important message. It sends a message that heroes and people who we respect, and people that we look up to, come in all different shapes and sizes. And I think for the readers of the books, for the people who will see the movies in the future, I think that's a tremendously important message for them to carry forward.

TLC: Some parents are dealing now with children who are confused about what it is to be gay, and there are children confused because they are taught that it's bad, and they don't want to believe their parents who say that it's bad. What do you suggest parents do, and what do you suggest children whose parents aren't willing to talk to them, do to understand what this means?

SL: I think a lot of that ties back to what we were talking about earlier, which is that a lot of these stereotypes and myths and misconceptions about gay people really are borne out of a lack of knowledge and more specifically a fear of things that are different and people that are different. I think that when you look back at the Harry Potter books, one of J.K. Rowlng's most important themes is about treating people with dignity and respect.

I think one of the most important themes of the Harry Potter books is J.K. Rowling's message about making sure that we treat all people, whether they are the same as us, or whether they are different than us, with dignity and respect. If you think about it, one of the central conceits of the books is that there are purebloods, and muggles and half-bloods, and there is constantly some conflict among those, particularly among those who fear and hate those who are different, and in one very vivid example of that, would call them mudbloods. That's the sort of unkind language, the sort of stereotypes and sort of misconceptions that really do lead people to mistreat and dehumanize others.

You think about Prof. Dumbledore. Even before any of us knew that Prof. Dumbledore was gay, I think that we can agree that his character would never have approved of mistreating or abusing others or thinking ill of others. Now that we know that he's gay I think it's a very important reminder that whether you're straight or gay or are in the process of figuring that out, being the kind of person who treats others with love and dignity and respect, who looks out for other people, who stands up for them, and who protects them, is really what being a good person and good friend is all about.

TLC: What do you think the overarching impact of this revelation will be on the culture going forward?

SL: When a character like Prof. Dumbledore is revealed to be gay I think it has a tremendously influential impact of readers of all ages. J.K. Rowling's decision to allow readers to see Dumbledore for all of who he is, and I think also as importantly, her determination to preserve the authenticity of his character both in the films and the books, is going to enrich the power of these stories for generations to come.

I think that this provides a really great opportunity to remind ourselves and for readers of the books to remind themselves about one of the key themes of the Harry Potter series, and that is how fear of what is different can really lead people to do things that are unkind or dangerous and also at the same time elevate the sort of person that people really want to be in terms of the way they treat others. When you hear someone on the playground say "You're so gay," or, "That's so gay," that's a word that they're using as an insult. They're trying to hurt another person and make themselves feel bigger by making other people feel smaller.

Even before Ms. Rowling revealed that Prof. Dumbledore was gay I can't imagine that his character would ever have approved of mistreating or abusing others. And now that we know he's gay it really is an especially important reminder that whether you're gay or straight, treating other people with dignity and respect really is one of the most important values that we all can share.

~*~

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent Books News

419 Comments

Alaine

I find it interesting that my comments were not posted. It shows where this forum is leaning too.

Posted by Alaine on October 25, 2007, 12:49 AM
Wizengamut

Melissa, I hope this interview will help those HP fans who are struggling with the news of DD. I feel sad for those who can’t accept, who feel betrayed, who feel angry, who feel lost. It is a terrible place to be in to have all these strong emotions about something only to know that they, eventually, will lose their voice as more and more people see the simple truth that fiction is just a mere reflection of what is already present in the world. There will always be people who are gay and there will always be characters that are gay. It is an awful lot of wasted anger and rage at something that cannot be changed. So for all the hatefulness, outrage, etc. coming from these people, I think the responsibility of everyone else is to feel sorry for them because they only corner themselves in a box. These people will never live satisfied, well-rounded lives because their world is just to small to allow for differences.

Yes folks, even in fandom you will always have Malfoys. Even Dumbledore would feel sorry for them.

Posted by Wizengamut on October 25, 2007, 12:49 AM
mollywobble

To KB Prez, you have been a voice of reason in a very difficult world the last few days. Lord knows I’ve tried to get my point across, but I haven’t been able to do it as eloquently as you have.

Bratpack, thank you for represently the Christian faith with honesty and bravery. I think every Christian needs to study the history of their faith and figure out the context in which every rule and story is written in. Otherwise, you’re just blindly following. If God didn’t want you to think for yourself, he wouldn’t have given you free will and brain.

Posted by mollywobble on October 25, 2007, 12:50 AM
Mary Alice

well all I have to say is I love the news and am happy with the news that DD is gay.

This interview doesn’t tell me anything I need to know or don’t all ready know – not that I don’t have anything to learn about tolerance, everyone has room to grow in that area – but I all ready knew that it doesn’t change the most important stuff about Dumbledore – that he was a very talented Wizard who was also a good man, tolerant, kind, and giving, and a good mentor to Harry. For anyone who doesn’t know the issues touched on in this interview, or just wanted to see a supportive and tolerant response to the news that DD is gay in a way that fits with JK’s meaning for to book itself, well I’m proud of their decision to get put this interview out there. Maybe if society can change and grow a little more then every interview GLAAD has won’t have to start with “gay people are all different, they can be just like anyone else…most of us are frighteningly normal and even most of the ones that aren’t “normal” are great people and get criticized for things that wouldn’t even be questioned if they were straight” Prejudice against gay people is very much like prejudice against people of different races, very similar experiences. But so many people don’t know that, so they have to keep reiterating it in every circusmtance and never get the chance to go beyond it. The only way I see to go beyond it is to try and have that discussion with your gay friends and family and really try to get past the stereotypes with them.

I am sad that Dumbledore didn’t seem to have his romance work out, what seems to be his great love was also a cause of a lot of dissapointment. It does make for a compelling story but it’s very sad and even though DD was gay, and had a love, it was a tragic one and for all we know he lived a chaste life as a headmaster. Even if he had a relationship before or after Gridelwald, we don’t know how long any of them lasted and when, and so we’re left to believe that his only romantic love could’ve been a tragic one. People’s view of Dumbledore being so devoted to Hogwarts that he doesn’t have much room for a relationship could be very true – I always imagined he must have had a very colorful past to have learned all he learned but by the time Harry came around at least – indeed maybe even by the time he decides to duel his former love – he seems to be more devoted to being a teacher and for standing up against those who hate – even if he used to be in love with them – than anything else.

One thought is how that’s sad that the gay character has to have such a sad life. But it’s very honest. Even Romeo and Juliet died because of intolerance. While mixed-race couples are widely accepted in many areas in the US where I live, there are other areas in the US where people risk being violently attacked for dating someone of the opposite race. Or at the very least, the more subtle pain of not being accepted by racist members of the other race but also having their own race criticize them and say they don’t love their own race simply because they dated someone outside of it. Someone black, for example, having other black people criticize them for dating a white person is like a gay person coming out to their family and their family disowning them, not accepting them. At a vulnerable time when they are facing racism and need the support of other black folks they may find that they get criticism from there too. It can be very tragic and the challenges can end or destroy a very real love. I just read an article in Newsweek about an American soldier who fell in love with an Iraqi woman, even converted to Islam and learned to really love the Iraqi people. They had a kid. He was shot in the line of duty and now his kid says “Daddy” to her dad’s picture in the crib. That is a relationship, that like many gay relationships, was based on a very real, strong, and unselfish love and made the father more committed to fighting againt intolerance and spreading understanding but it was also fighting against many obstacles. Gay relationships are far from the only ones right now to be facing challenges, and far from the only ones in history to have faced challenges. So, sad but true, the tragic relationship isn’t an untrue representation, for many gay and non-gay relationships are doomed from the start due to intolerance, even in the most enlightened places in this day and age. The only hope is that more tolerance will make more loving relationships possible to last and more people will not only not be subjected to violence for their love, but have society be glad of any relationshp where the people are better, fuller, and happier people for it.

And before we say that the only tragic relationship she shows is gay – Snape’s only love was a tragic one, too.

And as mentioned, it is very positive that she created such an awesome character with so many great and interesting quaities and then said he was gay – THAT is at least very real and not stereotypical.

Finally, Dumbledore faced many temptations, including that he loved Grindelwald. Even before we knew he was gay we found out in the last book how human he was and how much he struggled. Some people disliked the book the last temptation of Christ because it showed Christ as very human, but others loved it because the fact a human could stuggle like that and still come out on top made the story of Jesus MORE remarkable to them. That he was more relateable because he actually DID experience some of the challenges all humans have face and it wasn’t easy for him just like it isn’t easy for us. They realized that it wasn’t simple or miraculous that Dumbledore or Jesus came out that way but a hard pressure cooker of challenges, lessons learned, hard work, and devotion along the way that turned a rock into a diamond. Harry may have had to accept Dumbledore was only human and wasn’t perfect, but I’m sure as he gets older he will grow to appreciate what DD did and how much DD sacrificed for those around him (even when it wasn’t easy) more and more.

Posted by Mary Alice on October 25, 2007, 12:53 AM
kendra

Yes folks, even in fandom you will always have Malfoys. Even Dumbledore would feel sorry for them.-yes we’re malfoys bc we disagee with u.

Posted by kendra on October 25, 2007, 12:54 AM
Greg

Go Melissa! I love you!

A couple quick questions to those that believe J.K. Rowling should have included this information IN the books:

  • Can you imagine if she had “outed” Dumbledore in the books?
  • Had she included this information, would we all have debated Dumbledore’s sexuality rather than revel in the beauty of the last book? (Seeing all the comments posted here, I wouldn’t be surprised if that was the case!)
  • Given our present day-in-age, wouldn’t such information have disrupted the flow of the book? Even if the thought was, “Wow, I’m so impressed she did that” or “Awesome, Dumbledore’s gay!,” the thoughts would have disturbed the momentum of the story. Perhaps it would have set an amazing precedent, but in the world we live in, it would have been a bumpy diversion.
  • Would it have been appropriate for a teacher (even in death) to discuss his or her romantic life with a student? None of the other teachers ever did.
  • What about those readers who oppose all things gay – would they have quit reading the book midway through, even after having spent years with the series?

J.K. Rowling is a brilliant woman and had a lot to consider. She knows how to write a story. Give her some credit. She knew what she was doing.

Posted by Greg on October 25, 2007, 01:00 AM
butsiriuslyfolks

While I’m still not necessarily comfortable with things like timing or the purpose of a late revelation, I have a lot of appreciation for the tone that Sean used in his interview. He really stated his stance very diplomatically and respectfully. Nicely done.

Posted by butsiriuslyfolks on October 25, 2007, 01:01 AM
Alaine

From Webster’s Dictionary to the person that said Sodom and Gamorah was not because of homosexula activity sodomy One entry found.

sodomy

Main Entry: sod·omy Pronunciation: \ˈsä-də-mē\ Function: noun Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city in Genesis 19:1–11 Date: 13th century : anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex; also : copulation with an animal — sod·om·it·ic \ˌsä-də-ˈmi-tik\ or sod·om·it·i·cal \-ti-kəl\ adjective

Posted by Alaine on October 25, 2007, 01:12 AM
fenm

Greg: “Would it have been appropriate for a teacher (even in death) to discuss his or her romantic life with a student? None of the other teachers ever did.”

“The Prince’s Tale” was ALL BOUT Snape’s love life. And since he intentionally gave those memories to Harry, it’s almost like “discussing it” with him. And there’s Lupin and Tonks. And, no these people weren’t Harry teacher’s anymore, but neither was DD at the time they met in King’s Cross.

Posted by fenm on October 25, 2007, 01:15 AM
SuperAurorGirl

Thank you, Melissa and Sean! This was a great interview, and I hope many in the comment threads I have been visiting these past few days can learn from them.

KB Prez, Professor Potter and many others, your positive contributions are respected and treasured. I also want to thank all those on the comments who have different positions but have managed to keep a kind tone to their arguments. Debate should never be discouraged, but I really hope that the fandom can eventually come together, whether to agree to disagree or to fully accept Dumbledore for what he is, a great, gay character.

Posted by SuperAurorGirl on October 25, 2007, 01:16 AM
christy

I am really glad Leaky took the time to do this interview (esp. Melissa who I know is busy with her own book writing!). I would’ve liked the question about how to approach children about homosexuality to have been better answered. A part of me wishes that Jo would’ve revealed Dumbledore was gay in book 7 so we could’ve understood him better and so there would be proof of this fact for future generations who read the book. But, a part of me thinks Jo was right to not write Dumbledore’s orientation into the story because some parents don’t feel comfortable introducing their young children to homosexuality. So, I would’ve liked GLAAD’s take on how to tell children about homosexuality, how much to tell them and how young should you tell them? I think it’s best to be completely honest (without being explicit, just like you would be with heterosexuality) but then again that brings us back to why didn’t JKR just give us this fact in the actual book to begin with?

Posted by christy on October 25, 2007, 01:24 AM
Fedup

“From Webster’s Dictionary to the person that said Sodom and Gamorah was not because of homosexula activity sodomy One entry found.

sodomy”

WILL you PLEASE just HUSH!!!!

Posted by Fedup on October 25, 2007, 01:26 AM
christy

Greg, you make some very logical points. I think I tend to agree with what you had to say.

Posted by christy on October 25, 2007, 01:28 AM
fenm

Alaine: Ok, I’ll bite: Where in what you quoted does it say that the residents of Sodom where destroyed for their homosexual proclivities?

Posted by fenm on October 25, 2007, 01:29 AM
Alaine

Everyone is entitled to say what they feel. Just because I don’t share the same view point I should hush. No I think not. I do not agree with JKR and the outting of DD. I think it was wrong. I am entitled to that opinion. I am disappointed not angry, or mad just totally disappointed in JKR and the whole thing. This forum can do what they want and say what they want because we have freedome of speech just like us Christians have freedom of speech.

Posted by Alaine on October 25, 2007, 01:32 AM
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! Join us at LeakyCon 2009! Learn more today! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 24 - Oct. 2008

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!
Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts! Cast spells and chat with your friends at the Chamber of Chat!

Hosted by Idologic Inc.