In The News
Leaky Interview with GLAAD (The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation)
BooksSince Friday evening's revelation that Prof. Dumbledore is gay, we've seen a lot of confused and oftentimes hurtful response and commentary on the topic. So, we called up GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, an organization that works specifically with the representation of gay characters and people in media, to help clarify some of the issues and talk about what this fact about Dumbledore means for our culture. A transcript of our interview with Sean Lund, the organization's director of Messaging and Communication Srategy, follows.
(Please again be reminded that debate is welcome but disrespectful, name-calling, hateful comments are being routinely deleted.)
~*~
The Leaky Cauldron: Thank you very much for taking the time to speak to us. Can you tell us more about GLAAD and what you do?
Sean Lund: GLAAD, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, is an organization that has at its core the fundamental understanding that words and images matter, that what people see in the media has a really important impact on how they view the people in the world around them and how they treat the people in the world around them.
I think we have a really great opportunity here to have a longer discussion about Prof. Dumbledore, about the characteristics and the qualiites that he embodies and to talk about the fact that one of the most beloved people in the Harry Potter series is gay.
TLC: What's the reaction been like for you?
SL: Most of the reaction that we've been hearing from folks as we've been talking about it with various media outlets has been very positive. We've seen, as I'm sure a number of your readers have, some of the message boards at The Leaky Cauldron and elsewhere that have been largely very supportive of J.K. Rowling's decision. There have been some of those who have seized on the opporutnity that the conversation provides to engage in some stereotypes and some slightly unkind behavior, but overall I think the conversation has been positive.
TLC: What do you think is the most important thing to urge people to remember as they are dealing with this revelation?
SL: I think it's important to remember that Prof. Dumbledore is exactly the same wise, loyal, kind character that those of us who have been reading the books have always known. He still embodies generosity and integrity and courage and the importance of protecting others. Just because he happens to be gay doesn't make him better and doesn't make him worse. It's just one of the parts of who that character is, which his exactly what being gay is in the real world: it's just a part of what makes each of us unique and each of us different.
TLC: One of the things we're noticing is that there are some real misconceptions out there about what it means when you say that somebody is gay. There is a bias toward, an unfortunate assumption that gay means other things, such as child molestation and pedophile. Is this common?
SL: I think any time you're dealing with the misconceptions and myths and stereotypes about gay people you tend to be coming from a place of ignorance or more commonly fear about what it is like to be gay. I think one of the most important messages of the Harry Potter books is how fear, whether it's fear of what's different, whether it's fear of losing power, whether it's fear of change, can lead people to do and say things that are at best unkind and at worst sometimes even dangerous.
Some of the comments that we've seen about Prof. Dumbledore and some of the other comments that we've seen over the past several days relating to this story have kind of crept into those areas of stereotypes and misconceptions, and I think that the really valuable thing that folks like you and other folks that are really Harry Potter fans and other folks in the media are doing, is really raising the level of conversation so that those stereotypes and myths aren't allowed to go unchallenged.
TLC: Can you remember a recent time when another fictional character has been revealed as gay that has had this kind of impact?
SL: I think that probably the one that springs to mind most readily is the character of Willow on "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," back, I think it was probably about six years or so ago now when [the show's creator,] Joss Whedon, who revealed in a very gradual way and in a way incredibly authentic for that character that she was gay and introduced her girlfriend Tara, and the two of them became a really wonderful couple on that show. That was a really perfect exmaple of how to do this sort of storytelling and how to create these characters right. When you take a look at how the audience reacted to that, there was such an investment in those characters and in that relationship. The Willow and Tara relationship became in some ways the moral center of that show.
I think very much with how J.K. Rowling has brought Dumbledore out, I think that sort of quality of maintaining the authenticity and maintaining the truth of the character really goes a long way in terms of making sure people stay invested in those characters, and in fact that people could keep even more invested and feel like they have additional points of identification with those characters.
TLC: The Willow comparison also touches on something else - we've been getting a little backlash from gay people as well, who complain that it's yet another gay character killed or was lonely (Tara, Willow's girlfriend is shot in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer"). Is this a common theme in gay culture as represented in the media?
SL: I think that we have definitely seen some of that criticism and I tend to think about the fact that for many people who have read these books since the very beginning - I happened to come in around the time book three was published - for many readers who are coming into these stories now, they are coming into a series of books where the character of Dumbledore will always have been known to be gay. There are other people who just finished the series with the release of Deathly Hallows who are now able to go back as readers have been doing since the books came out, and go back into the stories and view the characters through this new revelations that have been in the new book or in J.K. Rowling's recent interviews and really come to a deeper and richer understanding of these characters.
J.K. Rowling's revelations, could they possibly have happened in the books? I'm not sure, you'd have to ask her. What you'll see is that she set the stage for all readers of these books, be they those who have already finished them and those who have yet to pick up even the first book, to have a deeper and richer interaction with these characters.
TLC: This is the largest, most popular fantasy series of all time, this is a huge and respected character. To make not just any character but Dumbledore, the kind brilliant professor, Dumbledore, gay - is there any way to quantify what this means to the way that gay people have been portrayed in the media or accepted in culture?
SL: At the heart of GLAAD's initiative is a very simple idea, that words and images matter, and I think the idea that J.K. Rowling would reveal that Prof. Dumbledore is gay sends a tremendously important message. It sends a message that heroes and people who we respect, and people that we look up to, come in all different shapes and sizes. And I think for the readers of the books, for the people who will see the movies in the future, I think that's a tremendously important message for them to carry forward.
TLC: Some parents are dealing now with children who are confused about what it is to be gay, and there are children confused because they are taught that it's bad, and they don't want to believe their parents who say that it's bad. What do you suggest parents do, and what do you suggest children whose parents aren't willing to talk to them, do to understand what this means?
SL: I think a lot of that ties back to what we were talking about earlier, which is that a lot of these stereotypes and myths and misconceptions about gay people really are borne out of a lack of knowledge and more specifically a fear of things that are different and people that are different. I think that when you look back at the Harry Potter books, one of J.K. Rowlng's most important themes is about treating people with dignity and respect.
I think one of the most important themes of the Harry Potter books is J.K. Rowling's message about making sure that we treat all people, whether they are the same as us, or whether they are different than us, with dignity and respect. If you think about it, one of the central conceits of the books is that there are purebloods, and muggles and half-bloods, and there is constantly some conflict among those, particularly among those who fear and hate those who are different, and in one very vivid example of that, would call them mudbloods. That's the sort of unkind language, the sort of stereotypes and sort of misconceptions that really do lead people to mistreat and dehumanize others.
You think about Prof. Dumbledore. Even before any of us knew that Prof. Dumbledore was gay, I think that we can agree that his character would never have approved of mistreating or abusing others or thinking ill of others. Now that we know that he's gay I think it's a very important reminder that whether you're straight or gay or are in the process of figuring that out, being the kind of person who treats others with love and dignity and respect, who looks out for other people, who stands up for them, and who protects them, is really what being a good person and good friend is all about.
TLC: What do you think the overarching impact of this revelation will be on the culture going forward?
SL: When a character like Prof. Dumbledore is revealed to be gay I think it has a tremendously influential impact of readers of all ages. J.K. Rowling's decision to allow readers to see Dumbledore for all of who he is, and I think also as importantly, her determination to preserve the authenticity of his character both in the films and the books, is going to enrich the power of these stories for generations to come.
I think that this provides a really great opportunity to remind ourselves and for readers of the books to remind themselves about one of the key themes of the Harry Potter series, and that is how fear of what is different can really lead people to do things that are unkind or dangerous and also at the same time elevate the sort of person that people really want to be in terms of the way they treat others. When you hear someone on the playground say "You're so gay," or, "That's so gay," that's a word that they're using as an insult. They're trying to hurt another person and make themselves feel bigger by making other people feel smaller.
Even before Ms. Rowling revealed that Prof. Dumbledore was gay I can't imagine that his character would ever have approved of mistreating or abusing others. And now that we know he's gay it really is an especially important reminder that whether you're gay or straight, treating other people with dignity and respect really is one of the most important values that we all can share.
~*~
Interested in Books?
Sign up for free Email Alerts

Thanks for the interview it was interesting to see how the gay community is reacting to the news. :]

Rachel saidL “instead of only going to gay lobbying groups like GLAAD who have a clear political agenda.”
Everyone has an “agenda”. EVERYONE. This idea that interviewing a Christian group would give you a view on this revelation that has no “agenda” is ridiculous. And why should they interview a Christian group about this? They didn’t interview a gay group when Jo talked about the Christian themes on the book.


always_a_sidekick, the 10% statistics are based on one questionable poll, 50-60 years ago.

Also, M Jones, so you know. As JKR said the books are a lesson in tolerance. We don’t appreciate angry comments any more than you do. So even if you don’t like what we have to say, you are welcome here.

Someone-
That’s precisely my point. Do you honestly think that the number would be any less 50 or 60 years later? If it were, homosexuals would not be a part of mainstream television, movies, music, magazines, politics or in any way in the public eye at all.

Yeah Melissa, why don’t you ask Fred Phelps, valiant preacher of the gospel that he is, for an interview just to be “Fair and Balanced”.
NOT! Just kidding!! (ducks the flying veggies).
This was a wonderful interview. Thanks GLAAD for taking the time to talk to us and thanks Melissa for contacting them!

Thanks for the GLAAD perspective. That was really wise of you guys and much appreciated.
I’ve said this in the forums, and I’ll say this again here. If you think I am evil, amoral or otherwise inferior for being a gay woman and run into me at a con or other event, I really do hope you’ll say so to my face, because I suspect when you realize I’m a person pretty much exactly like you (example: my day was consumed by a broken toilet, my mother recovering from surgery and a sick cat—very banal, very not evil), it might be harder than you think to say it, and, hopefully, it may well encourage you to rethink your worldview.

I also want the thank TLC for setting such a great example. This weekend has been a whirlwind of emotion. I have let myself get worked up and write things I regret. I’m sure there are others who feel the same way. TLC, however, has responded to the issues with respect and maturity. So, thank you for bringing order to this chaos. Hugs all around. -Sarah

I find it most amusing that the smartest, character, the most intelligent, the better educated of the series is a homosexual.
Knowing that JK herself is heterosexual makes me smile.
What a curve!
That was well placed JK. What a lesson.

You know, I’d love to read an interview from an opposing group so long as its not a religious one. A real arguement and not one that claims, “Cause God said so.”

Thank you for posting a great interview. I hope Melissa does get the opportunity to interview Jo again and find out more from her about this topic. I’m very surprised that Jo never mentions (via Rita Skeeter or others) any anti-gay bias in the wizarding world, even though the pureblood/mudblood issue is at the heart of the story.

Wow! I must say this was an amazing article. A lot of people don’t understand what this means to the story and Dumbledore. Thanks Leaky for thinking about it enough to do this interview!

I wish we would have opinions from canon – no one wants to be insensitive and bigoted. But Dumbledore was in the closet and remained in the closet through the entire book and looked upon his past same sex attraction as something he regretted. We’re projecting onto Dumbledore our own wishes – but is that what the story actually says? No – Dumbledore is a good example of a the traditional Christian view, that acting out on gay feelings is immoral and Christians have choices not to follow on their desires if Scripture teaches that they are immoral. If we look at what Book VII shows us, Dumbledore appears to have come to the same conclusion since his own infatuation (and that was what it was – like Harry’s infatuation of Cho, only with horrific results). It’s not the fact that Dumbledore may struggle with homosexual attractions, but what he did with it – and I have to say, Rowling treats it from a traditional Christian point of view. That’s why I raise whether those who advocate gay lifestyles have actually read the books (Melissa’s interview appears to illustrate that this particular person has not – but please, correct me I am mistaken). I don’t think that if some who may want to live an outed and active lifestyle – well, Dumbledore is NOT their guy. For what we know from the books, Dumbledore lead a chaste and celibate life. But this is from the stories themselves – I do wish we’d discuss it from the stories and not what we wish it might be. Do you see what I mean?
ZR

Great article!
Melissa, so that wasn’t multiple people, just multiple personalities? LOL!
I actually liked the way we probably wouldn’t have guessed that Dd was gay. Like someone said, it was more realistic, and his sexual orientation wasn’t what he or the books were about. No where in the books is sex ever mentioned, or even sexual relationships, just various kinds of relationships. Budding romance and the feelings that go with it, but not sex. Even the mention about Dd’s relationship with Grindelwald was about feelings, not any ‘act’.
It can be seen as ‘how would we respond to the revelation that a loved one/relative was gay?’ There’s no reason to love or respect that person any less. They’re still the same wonderful person! Shouldn’t you love them for who they are, not who they bed? ...and when sex is in no way involved, what does it matter? In fact, when sex isn’t involved, doesn’t that make the love all the purer, albeit misplaced in this case.
I don’t get the argument that one can accept another as being gay, but not the ‘acting on it’. Can heteros act as who we are, but not allow homosexuals to do the same?
I’m with you, Bratpack, that’s what true Christianity should be about! You are a rare rose among an increasing number of thorns! You are the example others should see, not the vocal majority that scares them away! Kudos!

I honestly think this whole subject is being blown out of proportion, and I don’t think Jo wanted it to be, judging by the way she told us Dumbledore was a homosexual, so honestly and matter-of-factly; then moved on. Remember people, this is a book, a work of fiction. It’s being taken too seriously, and I don’t think GLAAD should have gotten involved, either. It seems as though the gay rights groups are now going to think this is a huge victory for them.
I agree with what Rachel is saying here, about being “tolerant”. If Leaky wants to be tolerant, they should also interview a Christian who has read Harry Potter, and get their take on this whole thing. When it comes to Harry Potter and other such controversial issues, Christians are generally portrayed at hate-mongers and such because of what we beleive, but the truth of the matter is, Christianity is an “intolerant” faith. It is. We only have one God, and a certain lifestyle that does not tolerate certain things, homosexuality being one of them. I don’t want this to be a sermon, so I’ll stop here.
Anyway, I’m really confused as to why Jo told us about Dumbledore being a homosexual AFTER the book had been published. I honestly think she should have included it in Deathly Hallows or not at all. I don’t like or respect Jo - or Dumbledore, for that matter- any less because of it, but it is a bit saddening and dissapointing to me. It seems as though she was trying to diversify the characters even more, as if she though “Hey, why don’t I throw in a homosexual character too?”.
Also, I actually wonder if Dumbledore was really still a homosexual by the time Deathly Hallows came around, or if his infatuation with Grindlewald was just a one time thing. Like, did he have any more loves after Grindlewald? And also, did Grindlewald reciprocate the feelings? I doubt it.
Bratpack, what a great testimony!

I would like to thank Rachel for her view-point, and wish to respond. I am a gay Chrstian, who is a HUGE HP fan. This was a victory for gays, straights, and everyone else. It proved that it doesn’t matter who you love, or what your orientation is, what matters is how much we can change the world for the better. JKR shows us that Dumbledore sacrificed a relationship with another man, in order to defeat evil. God Bless.

I don’t know, Mary. Maybe we do have only one God, but if thats the case, he was the god of people long before Christianity came around and homosexuality has existed since man evolved- earlier if you count the fact that animals sometimes practice homosexuality as well. What happened to all those people before God sent Christianity to oppose it? Did they go to hell for acting on the only nature they knew? Why is it that God suddenly become so intolerant when Jesus came to earth. Jesus was supposed to promote love and understanding.

I am a huge Harry Potter fan who has just heard the news of Jo Rowling’s announcement. How could she do this? It almost ruins the series for me and I wish I could turn back time and make it so I nevr heard this sad fact.

Sorry, comments are closed for this article.
Leaky Poll
Moving the HBP film to July 2009 is:
- Completely unforgivable16 (45%)
- Annoying, but I'll get over it13 (37%)
- Not something I care about.1 (2%)
- Cool; who wants to go to the movies in the winter anyway?1 (2%)
- Awesome! I get to save $10 until next year.0 (0%)
- Awesome! I get to save $10 because now I'm skipping this movie!3 (8%)
- I've made a Facebook group, started a protest, called my local councilman, staged a sit-in, started a boycott, and organized a million-fan march because we won't stand for the - wait, what was this about again?1 (2%)
M Jones… wow. GJ… wow.
I’d be willing to bet that in front of thousands of people, when being asked a direct question about Dumbledore and love, that she came up with his sexual orientation on the spot to get more attention. I guess she did the same with the info about Neville and Hannah getting married.
And I fail to see how this interview makes Leaky a mouthpiece for gay rights. I guess I missed the hot button issues in the interview… gay marriage, right to adopt, the legality of intimate acts between same sex couples…
Oh, wait. They weren’t there. The article was about handling this information in a mature and non-hateful way. And that point seems to have been missed entirely.
If the fact that Jo had “always pictured [Dumbledore] as gay” honestly makes you distrust the series and a site that is promoting a mature approach to the material, then you really should re-evaluate your outlook on the entire world. If you honestly think you live a 100% gay-free lifestyle, you’re fooling yourself. You are severely fooling yourself. The oldest statistics say that Dumbledore is within 10% of the male population. That’s one out of every ten. We sell you clothes, we write you tickets, we act on your TV shows, we serve you food in restaurants, we do your taxes, we write your paychecks, we make your cars, we build your homes, we teach your kids, we put out your fires… if the background information on a fictional character upsets you that much, then I can’t imagine what life will be like for you when you start counting people in groups of ten and wondering which of them is gay.
-Josh