i agree with steve…..., but at the same time i dont agree with him.
(i use to be potterlover92. i changed my name)
There is ’’no’’ reason a fan site for hp should or would be shut down, if this suit goes in Jo’s favor,such ’’scare ’’ tactics are absurd ! SVA is wrong in his attitude and i find it so very sad[ and down right sickening] he finds the aquirtion of monies more important than his,so called ,friendship towards Jo’s. His respect was apparently lost someplace for Jo’s, she trusted him and he used that trust against her.SVA true colours finally shown thru.
Mom Weasley, I too am an “older” and sometimes rabid fan of HP and Leaky and I have to say that I am very impressed by the intelligent postings and opinions that I read here. The staff of the Leaky has put information out for us to digest and I find it very interesting reading other views on this matter. Bravo to the Leaky staff for providing the forum.
LeakyStaff, your post made clear that you have been thinking this step through, and very much so. I always felt that your reporting on this case has been neutral, which I believe shows your professionality. Personally, I think that it was the right step to take, but it also became very clear how hard it was for you to come to this decision. It was a good move to show that not individuals have made this decision but that you, as a team, have made it. Kudos to all of you.
@Tom
“Sad news tonight, Diane. It seems even many months after the final Harry Potter book was released, most of the fans are still refusing to get a life.”
You certainly have the right, as do all who make their positions known, to make whatever statement you care to. I only wonder what your statement means to you considering that you are following this and actually commenting yourself.
As far as I am concerned, being interested in the series, the author, this case, or any or all of the above is an indication that we have more than a life. If this were our ONLY raison d’etre, then I might have a slight concern. But as there is no evidence to that effect, I wouldn’t make that statement myself. Still, it is always your right.
At least in my humble opinion.
M.
Well done, Leaky. Cheers.
And best of luck to Jo – we’re all behind you.
Katey, a right is a right, and it doesn’t really make a difference how much money that person has. Jo created this world, she has every right to protect it. And a true fan would never try and infringe that right.
And for those saying that Jo just wants publicity, ummm..guys, Jo can’t even answer a small fan question, or a give an interview in an Edinburgh newspaper without it becoming international breaking news. People hound on her no matter what she does, it isn’t like she ASKS for it! I mean, after everything, I still can’t believe people think Jo wants more publicity!! It sounds ridiculous just saying it!!
I could not disagree with you more Leaky People. I think you are sell outs. Steve’s site and his unwavering support of JKR are clear to me. I have always enjoyed his site and will continue to support it and further more I hope he wins the case against JKR.
Leaky I am ashamed of what hopeless suck ups you are.
You made the wrong decision. You should have stayed out of this period.
@ Zebra
You know, it’s sad, but I imagine you saying that aloud in the voice of an annoying 6 year old (no offense to 6-year olds), stomping your feet, pouting your lips, and with glistening eyes on the verge of tears. If it wasn’t for the absurdity of the post it might even be funny.
@M.
Per usual, you are clearly correct. We all have lives. This is just a fun, interesting part of it. Why is “TOM” posting here. Doesn’t that just mean he became part of our lifeless crowd?
People stick to the point. Name calling and insults are not furthering the discussion.
I think this is the right decision. People are allowed to disagree, of course, but those people who feel the need to insult TLC over this decision should grow up.
@ Zebra
You know, it’s sad, but I imagine you saying that aloud in the voice of an annoying 6 year old (no offense to 6-year olds), stomping your feet, pouting your lips, and with glistening eyes on the verge of tears. If it wasn’t for the absurdity of the post it might even be funny.
@M.
Per usual, you are clearly correct. We all have lives. This is just a fun, interesting part of it. Why is “TOM” posting here. Doesn’t that just mean he became part of our lifeless crowd?
People stick to the point. Name calling and insults are not furthering the discussion.
I want to give TLC a pat on the shoulder. You made the right decision. This entire lawsuit has made me uncomfortable as a fan. In fighting against JK Rowling’s wishes, I believe we are destroying more than what we are gaining. Getting the Lexicon published is not worth a fight with Rowling’s lawyers, in my opinion. I was content reading it online. I don’t want it in paperback or anything.
But yeah… I’m relieved and happy that TLC has severed all ties with the Lexicon. It felt a bit uncomfortable here for a while, but I’m glad that sanity has won the battle after all!
@ Cara
“As for copyright laws, they exist for a reason. You’re entire argument is fallacy. We’re not talking about ‘if only the laws were different’. They are NOT different and you may not like it but that does not change the fact that this is how the law currently stands – which means that Steve should have conformed to the law. He didn’t. Others who’ve written HP fan books have managed to conform to the law. Why should Steve expect the law to be any different for him?”
Yes, as I’ve also said, the law is what it is and it is in that context that this case goes forward. However, there is always the possibility that this case (as I’ve said in other posts in this thread) may become the one that changes the law (essentially changes Fair Use, for I believe this is the crux of the case). If that hapens, then a new set of rules goes into effect and until such time as those are analyzed, understood, applied, and, ultimately, tested in the courts in some new case, the ramifications are not clear.
So, those who say “if only the law were different” are not wrong to think or say that, but that is an outcome that is possible. If the law, or its application, does not change as a result of this case, those who lament its current form will continue to do so, and have every right to do so. But the case is, as you say, being tried on the law as it exists.
At least in my humble opinion.
M.