JKR/WB vs RDR Books Trial Day Two: Steve Vander Ark's Testimony
Companion Books
Posted by: Kristin
April 15, 2008, 05:56 PM
USA Today reports that Steve Vander Ark testified earlier today in the case brought by J.K. Rowling and Warner Brothers, who are attempting to block publication of a print version of the Harry Potter Lexicon website.
According to the article, during testimony, Steve Vander Ark was visibly upset when discussing the impact of the case. “It’s been difficult because there has been a lot of criticism, obviously, and that was never the intention. ... This has been an important part of my life for the last nine years or so.”
USA Today also reports that Mr. Vander Ark noted that he had concerns regarding whether the publication of the book would constitute copyright infringement, and that he was talked into publication by the publishing company.
UPDATE:
The Wall Street Journal Law Blog
reports on the testimony as well, noting that the Ms. Rowling and counsel were positioned directly in front of the witness stand.
The WSJ reports that in opening remarks, RDR attorney Anthony Falzone noted that Vander Ark’s interest has never been about money, but “passion”. In testimony today, Vander Ark reported that he has made about $6500 from the website between 2000 and 2008, through advertising.
For further information on the opening day of the trial, please see yesterday’s post here at The Leaky Cauldron .
160 Comments
I honestly don’t believe him.
If he had any doubts at all, maybe he should of NOT gone forward and seeked legal advise on his own?
every action has a reaction and in his professtion, I just don’t buy it.
Sadly this all came down to lack of respect, common sense and greed.
I hope he and rdr loose this case.
Posted by Magic what? on April 15, 2008, 06:33 PM
I can’t wait to read more of what he said. I wish this would be over with… If Jo doesn’t want it published then it shouldn’t be published. It isn’t the fist time something is being asked not to publish and Steve is taking this too far.
Posted by Jaimie on April 15, 2008, 06:35 PM
Thanks for keeping us up to date on this.
Posted by DorisCrockford on April 15, 2008, 06:36 PM
“he was talked into it and he, too, had substantial concerns ”? didn’t he just recently say, that they should win? all of a sudden he is concerned? what about his interview, where he said something completely opposite?
Posted by Squibby on April 15, 2008, 06:36 PM
I will wait to read Leaky’s version of todays testimony before I believe other sites, I think. Although I’m glad that he is feeling the reprecussions.
Posted by Paigekaeru on April 15, 2008, 06:38 PM
Steve had a choice – Should he do what is right or what is easy? RIP Cedric and Albus.
Posted by Shari on April 15, 2008, 06:40 PM
I had a feeling that Steve would use the “was talked into publication by the publishing company” card.
Was Jo there?
Posted by Rachel * on April 15, 2008, 06:40 PM
way to own up and take responsibility for your own actions, steve. oh wait…
Posted by Lauren on April 15, 2008, 06:44 PM
Yes, we need more information regarding exactly what was said. He did say he was pressured into doing this, than this is completely different than what he said in an interview two weeks ago. Plus, he always had a choice. He could have backed out.
I’m eagerly awaiting to hear his exact words.
Posted by mollywobble on April 15, 2008, 06:45 PM
Wow…. so now he stabbs the company that was going to publish him… if he had had those actual thoughts, he wouldn’t have been fighting so vigorously to publish his book. He would’ve stopped period. Tsk, tsk.
Posted by Vale on April 15, 2008, 06:45 PM
WOW! HEY STEVE, Sounds so much like the excuses that the Death Eaters used when they thought that Lord Voldemort was defeated when he murdered Harry’s Parents but failed to kill the Boy Who Lived.. History should repeat itself and SVA’s powers should be destroyed and JKR like the Boy will continue to grow and enjoy life as it should be.
Posted by whodat on April 15, 2008, 06:47 PM
I’m not really sure what to think, because Jo has the stuff about the Lexicon being her natural home, and now she says it is incorrect and sloppy etc, but then Jo is the one who created the world of Harry
Posted by Harriett on April 15, 2008, 06:48 PM
I think we all agree in one thing-we support Jo ofcourse! If she doesn’t want it-then NO! And who are they comparing to her?! She has all the rights on HP. It’s her story,it changed her life,my life and milions of others! and I’ll wait 10 more years or more for JOs LEXICON and other books! GO JO! thank you and God bless you!
Posted by matea on April 15, 2008, 06:50 PM
SVA may actually be feeling some regret now about believing RDR’s take on copyright infringement. He’s still a JKR/HP fan.
Thanks for the updates, Leaky.
Posted by Josephine on April 15, 2008, 06:50 PM
Come on you guys. He has been doing the Lexicon all along. Everyone looked at this from time to time. If Jo did not want him doing the Lexicon she should have said something years ago. Why was it OK to provide this timeline etc. when it was for free? It is not like he is going to be writing anything other than what he has already put into his web site. There are books already out there written by other authors. Why is his the only one being sued??
Posted by Gwynnie on April 15, 2008, 06:50 PM
I honestly don’t believe him. If he had any doubts at all, maybe he should of NOT gone forward and seeked legal advise on his own? every action has a reaction and in his professtion, I just don’t buy it. Sadly this all came down to lack of respect, common sense and greed. I hope he and rdr loose this case.