MyLeaky Login

Join the largest Harry Potter Social Network on the Web! | FAQ

In the News

J.K. Rowling on Dumbledore Revelation: "He is My Character" (Updated with Video)

JKR Interviews
Posted by: Sue
October 23, 2007, 03:12 PM

At a press conference this morning in Toronto, author J.K. Rowling was asked repeatedly about the recent revelations regarding the background information on Dumbledore and the fact that she said she felt this character was gay. Saying “I’m not kidding,” about this statement Jo made last Friday in New York, the author went on to note “I know that it was a positive thing that I said it for at least one person because one man ‘came out’ at Carnegie Hall.”

The Star (DH plot spoiler at link!) continues on to note J.K. Rowling emphasized the information was revealed because she was asked a direct question about it, and said “she didn’t feel the need to be explicit about Dumbledore’s sexual preferences because she wanted to focus on character development.

“If you were an author then you would understand that when you write the ending it comes at the end,” she said.”

Update: The entire video press conference with Jo is now online, here. Thanks Mahri!)

Jo continued on to say:
The plot is what it is,” said Rowling. “(Dumbledore) did have, as I say, this rather tragic infatuation but that was a key part of the ending of the story so there it is. Why would I put the key part of my ending of my story in Book One?”

Rowling said Tuesday she found it “freeing” to out Dumbledore, adding that the passages about him will mean different things to different readers.

“I think a child will see a friendship and I think a sensitive adult may well understand that it was an infatuation,” she said.

UPDATE: Reuters has more now from JKR, who elaborated on her decision to reveal the information about Dumbledore stating:”He is my character. He is what he is and I have the right to say what I say about him.”

Jo also said again “she might work on a Potter encyclopedia for charity, but only after a long break.”It’s like the break-up of a marriage. It’s a good idea not to see each other for a while, then maybe you can be good friends afterwards,” she said.”

Update 3: Photos of Jo from the press conference in Toronto, Ontario Canada are now up in our galleries, here.

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent JKR Interviews News

897 Comments

Wizengamut

BRAVO!!! WTG JO! That is exactly what I have thought all along, it is the sum total of DD’s personality that is important, not this one thing. Fabulous!!

Posted by Wizengamut on October 23, 2007, 03:22 PM report to moderator
skh

Finally, its nice to hear some clarification from Jo. This whole thing has gotten out of hand. Thanks Jo, you’re the best.

Posted by skh on October 23, 2007, 03:24 PM report to moderator
roonwit

Poor Jo, being quizzed over this issue. She almost sounds surprised it is such a big issue. But it also sounds like she is pleased in general that this is now out in the open, even if it is secondary to Dumbledore’s main character development.

Posted by roonwit on October 23, 2007, 03:27 PM report to moderator
Mom Weasley

Thank you Jo! Relax, have a cup of hot cocoa and just let the idjits twist in the wind. They’ll blow themselves out and you have made the world a better place.

(Fools will not believe anything that contradicts their narrow minded assessments and they’ll be out there searching for another reason to whine and twitch now that they can’t use this as an excuse.)

Posted by Mom Weasley on October 23, 2007, 03:30 PM report to moderator
Cian

Damn right she wasn’t kidding! This is such an important part of Dumbledore and only reinforces his place as my fav character.

Posted by Cian on October 23, 2007, 03:32 PM report to moderator
Cory

So does this mean Grindelwald didn’t feel the same? Was he even aware of how DD felt? I’m curious from a story perspective. If they had a big break up, or if DD just finally took his rose colored glasses off and realized what he was all about.

Posted by Cory on October 23, 2007, 03:32 PM report to moderator
Whitney

I’m disgusted by the news. I’ve lost all respect for Dumbledore.

Posted by Whitney on October 23, 2007, 03:37 PM report to moderator
eviemarie

I think Grindelwald probably didn’t return the infatuation. Dumbledore probably just had to realize he was being “blinded by love”.

Posted by eviemarie on October 23, 2007, 03:38 PM report to moderator
KB Prez

I agree with “skh”. Jo is THE BEST!

Posted by KB Prez on October 23, 2007, 03:39 PM report to moderator
Zee

Jo will be able to exhale when she gets back home. No one here is going to send her hate mail or death threats for outing one of her characters. And the fact that she has reinforced what she said is great. No backtracking to save face.

These are HER thoughts on HER characters. We may well be free to interpret the books in our own unique way but I trust her judgement on the books more than mine, afterall, she wrote the bleedin’ things.

Posted by Zee on October 23, 2007, 03:40 PM report to moderator
pauline seaman

Nice way to bolster profits. Maybe JO can donate new proceeds to homosexual efforts worldwide.

Posted by pauline seaman on October 23, 2007, 03:42 PM report to moderator
Cory

Did we ever find out who killed DD sister for sure?

Posted by Cory on October 23, 2007, 03:43 PM report to moderator
CHE

i said it before and i’ll say it again, i am very dissapointed at Rowling, is not only that homosexuality is not natural and is not right. i think that Dumbledore was a role model for today’s kids, but now she declares that he is gay after selling her last book… it’s not right for the kids who use to think of him as a hero. now i am sure a lot of kids don’t know what to think. my nephews are confused and questioning us about homosexuality and i think it’s dangerous for them and any other kid in the world. and it is unfair that she decided to make the declaration after the last book.. if i had known that there was a gay charachter in a children’s book i would not have bought the book for my nephews and i would not have read it miself. i will not be buying any more books from Rowling. clearly she knew that many people were not going to support this. so she chose to do this after she sold millions of dollars and not before. that is coward, convenient and honestly a little dishonest.

Posted by CHE on October 23, 2007, 03:47 PM report to moderator
lsdgj

“Why would I put the key part of my ending of my story in Book One?”

She didn’t even put it in book 7. Why not if it was a key part of the story. I’m sorry but she was too coward to do it. And of course there is the revenues to consider.

Posted by lsdgj on October 23, 2007, 03:50 PM report to moderator
R.

Well I guess I was wrong…

Posted by R. on October 23, 2007, 03:59 PM report to moderator
You must be logged in to MyLeaky to comment. Please click here to log in.
Why is Leaky YELLOW? Because Hufflepuff WON the House Cup! LeakyCon Live Album! The best wizard rock from LeakyCon on a two-disc set! Introducing MyLeaky! Your Harry Potter Social Network
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 26 - Nov. 2009

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!

Guess That Book

"Harry, we saw Uranus up close!" said Ron, still giggling feebly. "Get it, Harry? We saw Uranus -- ha ha ha --"[br]A bubble of blood grew at the corner of Ron's mouth and burst.

Cast spells and chat with your friends at the Chamber of Chat! Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts!

Introducing MyLeaky! Your Harry Potter Social Network Hosted by Idologic Inc.