In the News

JKR/WB vs. RDR Books Trial: "Fan Feud", from The New Yorker

News
Posted by: Kristin
May 06, 2008, 12:55 AM

Tim Wu in an article for The New Yorker looks at the events leading up to the trial, speaks to Steve Vander Ark, and compares J.K. Rowling to the mythical Athena:

“Once upon a time, a talented weaver named Arachne declared herself superior in skill to Athena, the goddess of wisdom, who also invented weaving. Whether Arachne was actually better we’ll never know, for Athena, in a jealous rage, destroyed her rival’s tapestry and turned her into a spider. Last summer, at a “Harry Potter” convention in Toronto, a fan named Steve Vander Ark made a similar mistake when he dared to compare himself to Joanne (J. K.) Rowling.”

Wu describes what led Vander Ark to create the Lexicon website, and notes that Vander Ark has suffered “cruel fates” as a result of the lawsuit:

“In the late nineties, while working as a children’s librarian in Byron Center, Michigan (pop. 3,777), he discovered the “Potter” series. He began to take notes and, by his own estimate, has read each of the books forty or fifty times. “Something about these detailed imaginative worlds just captivated me,” he said during a court recess.

In 2000, Vander Ark, who considers himself a Ravenclaw, turned his obsessive notes into a Web site, The Harry Potter Lexicon. Soon, he was a celebrity in the “Potter” community. But when he decided to turn his Web site into a book Rowling sued his publisher, effectively exiling him from the wizard community.”

Wu also notes Leaky webmistress Melissa Anelli’s presence in the court room:

Anelli is writing her own “Potter” book, with Rowling’s blessing, and during a break in the trial Rowling sought her out and gave her a warm embrace, a moment that might have been as difficult for Vander Ark as any part of the legal proceedings.

“Melissa has done more to hurt me than Rowling,” Vander Ark said during a recess. “I can’t blame her for liking her status.” After all, he said, Rowling “is God and Melissa is her prophet.” He went on, “I am an outcast now. But I still consider myself a ‘Harry Potter’ fan.”

*

Editor’s Note: In the above-mentioned article, Mr. Wu attributed several statements made during a recent PotterCast (number 148) to Melissa Anelli (“He is vilified now”, “He has ruined his good standing.”). These remarks were instead made by Leaky Editor Sue Upton, who was commenting on the impact the decision to publish the book has made upon Vander Ark’s reputation.

Previous Article | Next Article Browse all Recent News News

323 Comments

SiriuslyInLuv71

Just because this is the leaky cauldron website, I am not going to sit here and lie to you and say that what Jo is doing is dandy. Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against Jo, but what she is doing now to Steven is not right. Do you realize how much Lexicon has helped us? Sh!t, Lexicon even promoted her books to a certain extent. But none of that is remembered and Jo decides she wants to sue her most loyal fan. And the more messed up part about this is that, people say anyone can make a Potter Website full of contents. Well… where are they?

I just want you to name one website that is as reliable to canon as Lexicon. You cannot name any because there is none! Steven work shouldn’t be humiliated like this! He deserves to get that book published, and trust me I hope he will.

I know if his book gets published a lot of people will not buy the book out of spite, but guess what I have to say about that… that is your loss.

You guys are so obsessed with Jo, you will not see reason. Well, I do. Although I may love Jo, my heart resides with the people in fandom, and if we aren’t going to back each other up, then who will?

Posted by SiriuslyInLuv71 on May 09, 2008, 11:47 AM report to moderator
Shari

To SiriuslyInLuv71 : From what I’ve read about the lawsuit, Steve knew enough about the law to include a clause that he couldn’t personally be sued if anything went challenged. That implies that he had an inkling that the problem MIGHT arise. So he’s not as naive as some would make him out to be. Jo isn’t suing Steve but the publishing company as he made sure would be the case. You say that the Lexicon is more “canon” than any other website. That is a major point of Jo’s defense as he’s writing major parts of the Lexicon book word for word from her books!

I know that Steve has put in tons of effort and I actually like the Lexicon Website very much. But I guess that Jo’s point is, unless more original works are included, it just isn’t moral or legal to copy her words, put them in book form and sell for profit for himself.

So, even if RDR wins the lawsuit, I won’t be buying the book and I don’t consider it a loss at all. It certainly isn’t spite but a conviction of what I believe is the ethical thing to do.

Posted by Shari on May 09, 2008, 03:41 PM report to moderator
Caity

sighs its a shame to see that Steve has been reduced to something as petty as calling you out, Melissa. You don’t deserve that.

Posted by Caity on May 10, 2008, 04:45 AM report to moderator
Mad_Eye_Seeker

I was very disapointed with Steve’s comments about Melissa. I am very discusted with Steve for throwing out such hurtful comments infront of the entire nation. I am a dedicated PotterCast listener and I never hear any of the slander they quote Melissa of saying. The New York Times needs to run a reliability check on all of this before they publish such an article. P.S. I am looking forward to Melissa’s book

Posted by Mad_Eye_Seeker on May 15, 2008, 12:30 AM report to moderator
rebecca

do we know if steve real said that? I am really not sure.

Posted by rebecca on May 15, 2008, 04:00 PM report to moderator
Jessie

I wonder when the correction will be printed?

Posted by Jessie on May 16, 2008, 06:37 PM report to moderator
Wildfire

Well, Mr Tim appologised to Melissa, and the New Yorker SAID they were going to print a correction… but the correction (about the misquotes) is NOT in the same page as the article (if it was printed at all!) I think it should be in the SAME page as the article. If it’s not, what’s the use? People will still bump into the article and not know about the apology, the misquotes and the fact that the quotes have been taken out of context!

Posted by Wildfire on June 01, 2008, 10:29 PM report to moderator
Ophiolite Priestess

I have been reading the “New Yorker” since I was a little tot. I am disappointed that misquotes were made re: Melissa, since I feel the Potterverse is generally so well-intentioned and ...?innocent, almost, based on pure affection. This whole trial has just been a mess. However, Melissa, consider yourself in good company; some of the most influential people in the world have had their comments taken out of context in the “NYer”! By the way, I do actually read the corrections on a regular basis, so I will go back and look for them (I’m a little shocked that I missed this article till i heard about it on Pottercast….red face).

Posted by Ophiolite Priestess on June 04, 2008, 08:28 PM report to moderator
PotterCast Interviews Jo Rowling! Click here to Listen! Join us at LeakyCon 2009! Learn more today! The Books Everything...Half-Blood Prince...and the rest of the HP Films

Scribbulus Essay Project

Issue 25 - Dec. 2008

Scribbulus is THE place for Leaky Cauldron readers to submit their essays and opinion pieces!
See more over at Scribbulus!
Learn to knit your own 'Weasley Sweater'. Learn to brew your own 'Butterbeer'. Find out how at Leaky Crafts!
Cast spells and chat with your friends at the Chamber of Chat!

Hosted by Idologic Inc.